Backup of NAS, file shares, file servers and object storage.
Post Reply
dumb_licensing
Lurker
Posts: 1
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 21, 2023 1:49 pm
Contact:

NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by dumb_licensing »

So I've heard there's a new model where backing up to tape is going to consume licenses but not of Veeam files. Does this mean I can just make my NAS a VM and it won't be affected by this change? 500GB per instance you act like we're backing up to YOUR infrastructure, it's pretty ridiculous, but if this workaround is that easy, why bother making my license consumption instantly double for no reason?
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14417
Liked: 1576 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by Dima P. »

Hi and welcome to the forums,

Sure you can do that.
bsadiq
Lurker
Posts: 2
Liked: never
Joined: Jul 24, 2023 10:11 pm
Full Name: bsadiq
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by bsadiq »

I have physical NFS server with 100TB drive, can I mount it on a VM and backup the VM with the mounted drive to bypass the licenses?
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31561
Liked: 6725 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by Gostev »

No, as mounted drives are not included in the VM snapshot, which is what is getting backed up
bsadiq
Lurker
Posts: 2
Liked: never
Joined: Jul 24, 2023 10:11 pm
Full Name: bsadiq
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by bsadiq »

Do you have any suggestions on backing up 100TB physical Linux NFS server to Cloud and tapes?
TaylorB
Enthusiast
Posts: 92
Liked: 14 times
Joined: Jan 28, 2011 4:40 pm
Full Name: Taylor B.
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by TaylorB »

dumb_licensing wrote: Feb 21, 2023 2:01 pm So I've heard there's a new model where backing up to tape is going to consume licenses but not of Veeam files. Does this mean I can just make my NAS a VM and it won't be affected by this change? 500GB per instance you act like we're backing up to YOUR infrastructure, it's pretty ridiculous, but if this workaround is that easy, why bother making my license consumption instantly double for no reason?
Old post, but I just want to warn you on this one. I have been exploring similar workarounds as I felt blindsided by the file to tape costs, too. The problem with this solution is that what is going to tape will be a huge backup to disk file. So you'll have a 100TB (minus dedupe and compression) .vbk file spread across a lot of tapes. Say you need to restore a single NAS file from tape. You have to restore your 100TB .vbk file first, and then do a normal VM guest files restore from disk. So it could literally take you days to restore a single word document from tape.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31561
Liked: 6725 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: NAS backup to tape License workaround

Post by Gostev »

bsadiq wrote: Jul 27, 2023 11:19 pm Do you have any suggestions on backing up 100TB physical Linux NFS server to Cloud and tapes?
I would suggest using File Share backup jobs for Cloud, and File to Tape jobs for tape. But at this size, it makes little sense to license its protection with VUL. I would suggest that you contact your Veeam sales rep for a Capacity license. It's going to be cheaper than VUL right out of gate, plus Sales have much more flexibility with discounting Capacity licenses (unlike VUL).
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests