-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
correct configuration for HyperV
I have 6 HyperV servers with 45 machines (windows, linux). In a physical server I have installed the VEEAMBACKUP that acts as a proxy. As a repository I have a synology DS1815 +
I currently backup but it takes about 3 days to do everything.
Is there a proxy configuration recommendation? How can I speed up the process?
I currently backup but it takes about 3 days to do everything.
Is there a proxy configuration recommendation? How can I speed up the process?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8191
- Liked: 1322 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Mike Resseler
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
Hi sysadm.mac,
First: welcome to the forums.
It seems a bit odd that it takes 3 days to backup 45 machines. Considering your setup, I'm guessing you are using on-host proxies instead of offhost proxies. But first, what shows as the bottleneck in the report after the backup?
First: welcome to the forums.
It seems a bit odd that it takes 3 days to backup 45 machines. Considering your setup, I'm guessing you are using on-host proxies instead of offhost proxies. But first, what shows as the bottleneck in the report after the backup?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
thanks for your answer.
Exactly, I'm using Off-host backup (automatic proxy selection). At the end of the backup the bottleneck is "Target"
Exactly, I'm using Off-host backup (automatic proxy selection). At the end of the backup the bottleneck is "Target"
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
That means that your target storage is not capable of the I/O backup jobs assign to it. What backup method do you use? Forward/reverse incremental?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
All copies are made through iSCSI to a synology DS1815 + (network to 1Gb)
Max concurrent Task: 4
Max concurrent Task: 4
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
And what is the backup method configured in the job settings?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
Backup mode: Incremental (create synthetic full backup periodcally : Saturday)
ActiveFull backup: Create active full backups periodically (Weekly on selected days: Saturday)
I only do one weekly
ActiveFull backup: Create active full backups periodically (Weekly on selected days: Saturday)
I only do one weekly
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
So you just perform weekly active full backups with no increments in-between?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
What is the total amount of source data and what is the processing rate the job reports?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
An example:
HyperV01:
DATA:
Processed: 2.3TB (100%)
Read: 1.8 TB
Transferred 1000,4 GB (1,8x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 4:40:13
Processing Rate: 112MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
HyperV02:
DATA:
Processed: 863.0GB (100%)
Read: 604.5 GB
Transferred 456,7 GB (1,3x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 8:53:57
Processing Rate: 19 MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
HyperV03:
DATA:
Processed: 1,8 TB (100%)
Read: 1,3 TB GB
Transferred: 874,6 GB (1,5x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 12:54:13
Processing Rate: 30 MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
HyperV01:
DATA:
Processed: 2.3TB (100%)
Read: 1.8 TB
Transferred 1000,4 GB (1,8x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 4:40:13
Processing Rate: 112MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
HyperV02:
DATA:
Processed: 863.0GB (100%)
Read: 604.5 GB
Transferred 456,7 GB (1,3x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 8:53:57
Processing Rate: 19 MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
HyperV03:
DATA:
Processed: 1,8 TB (100%)
Read: 1,3 TB GB
Transferred: 874,6 GB (1,5x)
SUMMARY
Duraion: 12:54:13
Processing Rate: 30 MB/s
Bottleneck; Target
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8191
- Liked: 1322 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Mike Resseler
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
Are these jobs running at the same time? While hyperv01 is acceptable, the other two seem rather slow and both are also showing (as already stated in this thread) that the Synology is the bottleneck. Can you see if there is heavy load on that box while the backup is performing?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
I have configured a 2 SSD as R/W cache but it is still 3 days.
I do not see bottle necks in the NAS. It is only used for VM backup
I do not see bottle necks in the NAS. It is only used for VM backup
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
How the storage is added as repository in Veeam B&R - CIFS or Windows (iSCSI LUN)?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018 6:25 pm
- Full Name: sysadm.mac
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
Windows (iSCSI LUN)
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: correct configuration for HyperV
Not sure why the rest of the jobs take that longer... I'd ask support for a closer look at your setup.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests