-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jul 20, 2023 3:16 pm
- Full Name: Sanath Bhandari G
- Contact:
Patching rollback options available for veeam proxy server
Hi All,
I have a general query regarding Veeam proxy server. We are using a Linux based appliance as proxy server, I just wanted to know what are the rollback options available in case the patching goes wrong?
I have a general query regarding Veeam proxy server. We are using a Linux based appliance as proxy server, I just wanted to know what are the rollback options available in case the patching goes wrong?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 558
- Liked: 208 times
- Joined: Mar 07, 2016 3:55 pm
- Full Name: Ronn Martin
- Contact:
Re: Patching rollback options available for veeam proxy server
If the system is functioning correctly you should see Nutanix AHV snapshots for the proxy VM in the VBR console which would allow quick rollback to an existing snapshot otherwise you could simply run an ordinary VM snapshot/rollback via Prism. In case it all goes wrong you should take a proxy configuration backup which could be restored to a new proxy instance.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jul 20, 2023 3:16 pm
- Full Name: Sanath Bhandari G
- Contact:
Re: Patching rollback options available for veeam proxy server
Thanks for the answer Ronn. Can you share any article that shows how to perform proxy configuration restore to new proxy instance.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 558
- Liked: 208 times
- Joined: Mar 07, 2016 3:55 pm
- Full Name: Ronn Martin
- Contact:
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 50
- Liked: 7 times
- Joined: Jan 24, 2023 11:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: Patching rollback options available for veeam proxy server
I'm going to correct ronnmartin61 slightly. The AHV snapshot jobs for protecting the AHV proxies existed in AHV proxy v3 (and possibly earlier, I don't know). This was replaced in v4/VBR12 to have the VBR server include AHV configurations in its regular configuration file backups.
I was confused by this new behavior as well and have it documented in this forum thread: post485051.html
I was confused by this new behavior as well and have it documented in this forum thread: post485051.html
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests