-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 09, 2019 2:04 pm
- Full Name: Brian Doell
- Contact:
Immutability Retention
We are looking to implement immutable online backups and started looking at the new Object Lock feature in V10. https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backu ... ml?ver=100
But our initial discovery found that we could not do very long retention. We are wanting to have immutability for 7 years. Is that not possible?
We've moved over to looking at doing the AWS VTL method https://www.veeam.com/wp-using-aws-vtl- ... guide.html , which sounds like it should do it and we're going to test.
But ideally we would use the new Object Lock feature.
Did we miss something, or can we not do 7 year retention with the new object lock immutability in v10?
Thanks!
But our initial discovery found that we could not do very long retention. We are wanting to have immutability for 7 years. Is that not possible?
We've moved over to looking at doing the AWS VTL method https://www.veeam.com/wp-using-aws-vtl- ... guide.html , which sounds like it should do it and we're going to test.
But ideally we would use the new Object Lock feature.
Did we miss something, or can we not do 7 year retention with the new object lock immutability in v10?
Thanks!
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 9848
- Liked: 2607 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
There is already a forum post for that.
Should be possible with powershell. But the command was never given there
object-storage-f52/what-is-the-maximum- ... 66740.html
Should be possible with powershell. But the command was never given there
object-storage-f52/what-is-the-maximum- ... 66740.html
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 492
- Liked: 175 times
- Joined: Jul 21, 2015 12:38 pm
- Full Name: Dustin Albertson
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
I would highly suggest VTL for a 7 year retention. the Object lock feature is for S3 and keeping 7 years in S3 would be a more expensive situation and if you made a mistake with a job you are stuck with it for 7 years.
Dustin Albertson | Director of Product Management - Cloud & Applications | Veeam Product Management, Alliances
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
It can be done with PowerShell indeed, but it's not a good idea. We don't just randomly block this in UI, there are good reasons that have to deal with the architecture.
Thing is, we see SOBR Capacity Tier as a hot storage, so it's immutability logic is designed for cost-efficient protection of recent backups.
7 years retention is rather a cold storage use case, this will be addressed with SOBR Archive Tier in v11, including immutability for the entire duration of the retention policy, and support for the appropriate cold storage tiers (Glacier and Deep Archive).
Thing is, we see SOBR Capacity Tier as a hot storage, so it's immutability logic is designed for cost-efficient protection of recent backups.
7 years retention is rather a cold storage use case, this will be addressed with SOBR Archive Tier in v11, including immutability for the entire duration of the retention policy, and support for the appropriate cold storage tiers (Glacier and Deep Archive).
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 09, 2019 2:04 pm
- Full Name: Brian Doell
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Thanks for the responses guys. How far out is v11? A few years?
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Release naming aside, we've been shipping major releases approx. annually, so more like in half a year. Should be in private beta next month, so you will be able to play with it already.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 09, 2019 2:04 pm
- Full Name: Brian Doell
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Oh that's a lot fast than I expected. Will Glacier be supported in that beta?
In our situation we have 7-year backups in 2 physical locations so the cloud is being positioned as worst case scenario recovery and in the future we may reduce retention locally.
So as you could imagine, recovery time isn't a concern, so cheapest cost per TB is.
In our situation we have 7-year backups in 2 physical locations so the cloud is being positioned as worst case scenario recovery and in the future we may reduce retention locally.
So as you could imagine, recovery time isn't a concern, so cheapest cost per TB is.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Yes, the private beta next month will be feature-complete. Glacier is already supported in the current builds.
Sounds like it's the perfect target for your use case.
Sounds like it's the perfect target for your use case.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 09, 2019 2:04 pm
- Full Name: Brian Doell
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Is there a way to sign up for this private beta?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 492
- Liked: 175 times
- Joined: Jul 21, 2015 12:38 pm
- Full Name: Dustin Albertson
- Contact:
Re: Immutability Retention
Reach out to your local Veeam SE/SA...they will have access and can make sure you get listed. They will also work with you to provide feedback.
Dustin Albertson | Director of Product Management - Cloud & Applications | Veeam Product Management, Alliances
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests