Discussions related to using object storage as a backup target.
mkretzer
Veeam Legend
Posts: 1192
Liked: 412 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: V12: Main Benefits of using Local Object Storage vs. Linux Repo

Post by mkretzer » 1 person likes this post

There is one more benefit using Linux: In theory, if you use premium hardware with lots of redundancies (like we do) you can span the LVM over multiple storage systems (especially for primary storage and if you have a also premium backup copy target). Also, since you can migrate LVM online i still believe that at these sizes XFS + LVM is *much* more flexible.
Still, jorgedlcruz's comment comes into play here: you have to be very comfortable with Linux and have to know exactly what you are doing!

I hope for the foreseeable future Veeam still invests in/supports XFS as for us its one of the best features Veeam has ever provided!
dhnz
Veeam Software
Posts: 22
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Mar 20, 2017 5:37 am
Full Name: David Hills
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: V12: Main Benefits of using Local Object Storage vs. Linux Repo

Post by dhnz » 1 person likes this post

Two use-cases I'm the most excited about:

- Much simpler conversation in SMB - if they want to use a QNAP or TrueNAS you can! Just enable the built-in S3 connector and no more tricky conversations about iSCSI or Linux VMs. Which includes Agent Backups
- Multiple Buckets! Each "Tenant" in an MSP or Department" in a business can have their own bucket. This makes billing and chargeback of raw consumption much easier than trying to do that with volumes on XFS
Regnor
VeeaMVP
Posts: 998
Liked: 309 times
Joined: Jan 31, 2011 11:17 am
Full Name: Max
Contact:

Re: V12: Main Benefits of using Local Object Storage vs. Linux Repo

Post by Regnor »

@dhnz: In your opinion how reliable are the S3 services of QNAP, Synology, etc? If SMB and at some point iSCSI aren't seen as reliable, can we trust the S3 implementations?
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31606
Liked: 7095 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: V12: Main Benefits of using Local Object Storage vs. Linux Repo

Post by Gostev »

Exactly. It was never their focus in the first place, so I would expect that to be a checkbox-quality functionality in terms of performance and scalability at least, and possibly reliability.
chris.childerhose
Veeam Vanguard
Posts: 586
Liked: 140 times
Joined: Aug 13, 2014 6:03 pm
Full Name: Chris Childerhose
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: V12: Main Benefits of using Local Object Storage vs. Linux Repo

Post by chris.childerhose »

dhnz wrote: Jul 15, 2022 3:38 am Two use-cases I'm the most excited about:

- Much simpler conversation in SMB - if they want to use a QNAP or TrueNAS you can! Just enable the built-in S3 connector and no more tricky conversations about iSCSI or Linux VMs. Which includes Agent Backups
- Multiple Buckets! Each "Tenant" in an MSP or Department" in a business can have their own bucket. This makes billing and chargeback of raw consumption much easier than trying to do that with volumes on XFS
This will be interesting as I have a Synology at home I can test with this theory. Going to be something we will look at being an MSP since we are now moving away from ReFS to XFS now to add immutability.
-----------------------
Chris Childerhose
Veeam Vanguard / Veeam Legend / Veeam Ceritified Architect / VMCE
vExpert / VCAP-DCA / VCP8 / MCITP
Personal blog: https://just-virtualization.tech
Twitter: @cchilderhose
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests