- Posts: 83
- Liked: 13 times
- Joined: Feb 02, 2017 6:31 pm
I don't want this behavior.
If I make multiple overlapping SOBRs (ie a folder on the same backend disk), is that valid? Or will I run into problems?
So in other words, where SOBR1 and SOBR2 are the same backend server(s), just a different folder path:
JOB-A (standard VMs) -> SOBR1 -> /backups/standard -> NO S3 capacity tier
JOB-B (critical VMs) -> SOBR2 -> /backups/critical -> S3 capacity tier
Seems backwards to create multiple SOBRs for the same backend infra, but i don't see another way to not send 100TB to S3 that i don't want to send. Or alternatively creating multiple physical servers to create a unique SOBR per retention type. Which is not an option here.
Or is there a better way?
- Product Manager
- Posts: 7108
- Liked: 1884 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
It's possible, supported by us and will not create any technical issues. In V10/V11, create a new backup repository or SOBR for the Jobs you don't want to have on capacity tier.
In V12, you can use Backup Copy Jobs to directly copy backups to object storage. I believe, that will solve your scenario in the future.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests