Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
lando_uk
Veteran
Posts: 371
Liked: 32 times
Joined: Oct 17, 2013 10:02 am
Full Name: Mark
Location: UK
Contact:

Fixing a corrupted backup chain, starting again?

Post by lando_uk »

Hi

I have a job that wont transform at the weekend due to an error in the chain, so I wish to start a new full backup for tonight.

Can I simply disable the job, rename the original folder on the repository and then enable the job, and when the backup starts it'll see that no existing files are there and start a full?

What about the existing copy job, will that need to also be deleted/renamed or will the it sort itself out?

Thanks
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20283
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Fixing a corrupted backup chain, starting again?

Post by veremin »

Instead of dealing with enabling, disabling options and moving existing files around, why not to initiate active full backup cycle (right-click -> active full backup)? Thanks.
lando_uk
Veteran
Posts: 371
Liked: 32 times
Joined: Oct 17, 2013 10:02 am
Full Name: Mark
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Fixing a corrupted backup chain, starting again?

Post by lando_uk »

I'll give it a go. Currently I have create synthetic on Sat or Sun, I presume I just tick the `active full backup` and chose Sat,Sun there ?

So the old (faulty) synthetic vbk, vib and vbr will not get touched anymore and just time out and get deleted when the retention is reached?
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20283
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Fixing a corrupted backup chain, starting again?

Post by veremin »

Currently I have create synthetic on Sat or Sun, I presume I just tick the `active full backup` and chose Sat,Sun there ?
Yep, disable synthetic full backup and enable active full one instead.
So the old (faulty) synthetic vbk, vib and vbr will not get touched anymore and just time out and get deleted when the retention is reached?
Correct.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 85 guests