-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: May 14, 2014 9:39 am
- Contact:
Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Hi,
i´m new here. Can someone tell me the diffrence betwen a backup to tape Job and file to tape job ?
Thank you for your help
i´m new here. Can someone tell me the diffrence betwen a backup to tape Job and file to tape job ?
Thank you for your help
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2800 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Hi,
Yes, sure. Here you go:
Yes, sure. Here you go:
Thanks!User Guide wrote:▪Backup to tape jobs allow you to archive full backups or forward incremental backup chains stored on disk
▪Files to tape jobs allow you to archive files from any Microsoft Windows or Linux server connected to the Veeam backup server or from a shared folder accessible by the Veeam backup server
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: May 14, 2014 9:39 am
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Hi,
so if I use reversse incremental Backup it makes no diffrence if i do a File to tape or Backup to tape Job is this right ?
Thanks!
so if I use reversse incremental Backup it makes no diffrence if i do a File to tape or Backup to tape Job is this right ?
Thanks!
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20413
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
It makes, because a files to tape job will transfer both .vib and .vbk files, meanwhile, a backup to tape one only .vbks. Thanks.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2800 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Additionally, if you use backup to tape jobs, you will be able to track what VMs are on tapes, as opposed to using file to tape jobs. In the second variant you will only know which files are stored on tapes.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14726
- Liked: 1706 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Christoph,
As guys said, having file to tape job with reversed incremental is ok because it will recognize backup as a regular file, so both vrb’s and vbk’s are pushed to tape. Keep in mind that file to tape job does not provide you the advanced scheduling options like starting tape job after the source disk job is completed or when new backup file appear in the repository.
In addition you can refer to our Help Center > Archiving Data to Tape chapter. Thank you.
Existing backup to tape functionality has one limitation for backup source - reverse incremental backups .vrb and Microsoft SQL Server log files .vlb are skipped, so if you target backup to tape to the reversed incremental backup, only vbk will be transferred.so if I use reversse incremental Backup it makes no diffrence if i do a File to tape or Backup to tape Job is this right
As guys said, having file to tape job with reversed incremental is ok because it will recognize backup as a regular file, so both vrb’s and vbk’s are pushed to tape. Keep in mind that file to tape job does not provide you the advanced scheduling options like starting tape job after the source disk job is completed or when new backup file appear in the repository.
In addition you can refer to our Help Center > Archiving Data to Tape chapter. Thank you.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 50
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Oct 16, 2019 5:04 am
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Hello
"Additionally, if you use backup to tape jobs, you will be able to track what VMs are on tapes, as opposed to using file to tape jobs. In the second variant you will only know which files are stored on tapes."
Does the above statement mean that "Backup to Tape" jobs are for backing up entire VMs and or physical servers, while "File to Tape" jobs are as the name implies, VM or physical server directories and files only?
Thank you.
"Additionally, if you use backup to tape jobs, you will be able to track what VMs are on tapes, as opposed to using file to tape jobs. In the second variant you will only know which files are stored on tapes."
Does the above statement mean that "Backup to Tape" jobs are for backing up entire VMs and or physical servers, while "File to Tape" jobs are as the name implies, VM or physical server directories and files only?
Thank you.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 20
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 19, 2016 5:07 am
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Correct. You may treat the "File to Tape" procedure as a more granular approach of protecting particular files and folders on your physical servers or inside the VMs. In the contrary "Backup to Tape" operates whole objects be it virtual machines or physical servers.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 50
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Oct 16, 2019 5:04 am
- Contact:
Re: Diffrence between Backup to Tape and File to Tape
Hello Net Runner,
Got it!
Thanks for the clarification!
Got it!
Thanks for the clarification!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests