-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 06, 2017 2:03 pm
- Full Name: Shawn Krawczyk
- Contact:
File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Situation:
We have data that is sitting in a Veeam repository that needs to be copied to tape (essentially file server data from remote sites). When comparing a "File to tape backup" to a "backup to tape" job, the file to tape is running an average of 17 MB/s vs. 50 - 70 MB/s from the same repository. I understand this isn't a great comparison as the file to tape is lots of little files vs. the backup to tape which is large VMDK's. I see others have had this same issue years ago via this post: "tape-f29/files-to-tape-is-painfully-slow-t17802-75.html". We have TB's worth of data that I need to get to tape and at the current rate it will never happen even if I let it run ALL month.
So my questions are:
1. Is anyone else having this same slowness issue?
2. Is there a better way within Veeam to backup lots of small, file server type data to tape?
We have data that is sitting in a Veeam repository that needs to be copied to tape (essentially file server data from remote sites). When comparing a "File to tape backup" to a "backup to tape" job, the file to tape is running an average of 17 MB/s vs. 50 - 70 MB/s from the same repository. I understand this isn't a great comparison as the file to tape is lots of little files vs. the backup to tape which is large VMDK's. I see others have had this same issue years ago via this post: "tape-f29/files-to-tape-is-painfully-slow-t17802-75.html". We have TB's worth of data that I need to get to tape and at the current rate it will never happen even if I let it run ALL month.
So my questions are:
1. Is anyone else having this same slowness issue?
2. Is there a better way within Veeam to backup lots of small, file server type data to tape?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14720
- Liked: 1705 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Hi Shawn,
Can you please clarify what Veeam B&R version you are using? Thanks.
Can you please clarify what Veeam B&R version you are using? Thanks.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 06, 2017 2:03 pm
- Full Name: Shawn Krawczyk
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
We are on 9.5.0.823.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14720
- Liked: 1705 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Thanks for the clarification and sorry for keeping silence. Need to know the raw estimate on number of files you are trying to push to tape. Are you talking about windows file server? How this server is connected to your tape device and tape library? Thanks.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 06, 2017 2:03 pm
- Full Name: Shawn Krawczyk
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Looking at one of the folders that needs to get to tape, its over 200,000 files.
Yes its all file server data. The tape drive is connected to the physical Veeam server via. a fiber channel switch.
Yes its all file server data. The tape drive is connected to the physical Veeam server via. a fiber channel switch.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14720
- Liked: 1705 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Shawn,
I am afraid for such number of files you should install SQL server Standard or Enterprise Edition for your Veeam B&R database. If your case backup server database is a bottleneck due the limitations of a bundled SQL Server Express Edition.
I am afraid for such number of files you should install SQL server Standard or Enterprise Edition for your Veeam B&R database. If your case backup server database is a bottleneck due the limitations of a bundled SQL Server Express Edition.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 32
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 06, 2017 2:03 pm
- Full Name: Shawn Krawczyk
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
We are running SQL server 2014 enterprise on directly attached SSD storage.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20406
- Liked: 2298 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Then, it's time you open a ticket with our support team and let them investigate this issue directly. The reported issue doesn't look expected. Thanks.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 12
- Liked: never
- Joined: Dec 27, 2017 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
Was there a resolution on this? I also have a need to do a monthly file to tape job which is unusably slow. Worked fine for my old Backup Exec software.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 12
- Liked: never
- Joined: Dec 27, 2017 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: File to tape much slower than backup to tape
My issue was resolved by moving my Veeam B&R software to a server with more memory.o_jay wrote:Was there a resolution on this? I also have a need to do a monthly file to tape job which is unusably slow. Worked fine for my old Backup Exec software.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests