Discussions related to exporting backups to tape and backing up directly to tape.
Post Reply
JTT
Service Provider
Posts: 102
Liked: 2 times
Joined: Jan 02, 2017 7:31 am
Full Name: JTT
Contact:

LTO type vs barcode label mismatch

Post by JTT »

Just to confirm, Veeam detects LTO type and if that does not match the barcode, then it can load/use the tape - correct?

Also, what happens if we have LTO7 WORM tapes, but apparently HP do not offer barcode label for this kind of tape type, only regular LTO7 labels are available to order.
But on the Veeam KB page, there is specific code for WORM tapes:
https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backu ... ml?ver=110
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14417
Liked: 1576 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: LTO type vs barcode label mismatch

Post by Dima P. »

Hello JTT,

We rely on the barcode on the first place but do check the tape chip information as well. If barcode does not match the tape information - you will get an error notification in any tape related activity and such tape wont be used. Thanks!
JTT
Service Provider
Posts: 102
Liked: 2 times
Joined: Jan 02, 2017 7:31 am
Full Name: JTT
Contact:

Re: LTO type vs barcode label mismatch

Post by JTT »

Okay, but is there any kind of chance or option to override this check? For an example of using LTO7 labels on LTO7 WORM tapes?
As i understand, Veeam can still identify the tape as WORM, but does the label itself have that much affect, or is it just by design, LTO type must equal type on label if the label exsist?

We are still waiting for information from HP, because it seems that they do not offer labels for LTO7 WORM, only regular LTO7.

Also to confirm, tapes without labels, Veeam names them automatically Tape + number. If these tapes are taken out of the library and reinserted, will these tape + number match or nor? Does Veeam keep track of these tapes by the same number and is it written on the tape also?
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14417
Liked: 1576 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: LTO type vs barcode label mismatch

Post by Dima P. »

Okay, but is there any kind of chance or option to override this check? For an example of using LTO7 labels on LTO7 WORM tapes?
You can potentially use those tapes without labels as a temporary workaround.
We are still waiting for information from HP, because it seems that they do not offer labels for LTO7 WORM, only regular LTO7.
I believe you can get those via Amazon or even print labels on your own :)
Also to confirm, tapes without labels, Veeam names them automatically Tape + number. If these tapes are taken out of the library and reinserted, will these tape + number match or nor?
Yes.
Does Veeam keep track of these tapes by the same number and is it written on the tape also?
Name is stored on the tape and in the Veeam B&R database.
lyapkost
Expert
Posts: 221
Liked: 48 times
Joined: Nov 27, 2015 2:26 pm
Full Name: Konstantin
Location: Saint Petersburg
Contact:

Re: LTO type vs barcode label mismatch

Post by lyapkost »

Hi JTT.

You may use other LTO WORM barcode, for exapmle, LTO6 or LTO8. It won't affect the tape capacity and speed (I'm not sure about HW vendor specific but at least you may try). In VBR we only require that WORM tapes have WORM barcodes and usual tapes have non-WORM ones and that there were no duplicated barcodes. Using barcodes from different generations may confuse yourself later, however, it should be less confusing then not using barcodes at all.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests