As Dima stated, because VAW 2.0 is not cluster aware, it is not possible to avoid this at this point in time. A question though, is it the idea to have a fixed node running all the time (or as much as possible?) Say Node 1? The reason I ask is that in most cases (not all obviously) a cluster is setup and the idea is that cluster node 1 is running the resources as much as possible, only failover when maintenance need to be done or there is actually an issue with it.
If that is the case, then only protecting one node should normally be enough to be protected. Only during maintenance times you would be without protection but I assume you don't want those periods to be long anyway
Makes sense? Possibility?