-
- Expert
- Posts: 206
- Liked: 14 times
- Joined: Jul 23, 2013 9:14 am
- Full Name: Dazza
- Contact:
VBO versus competitors
I'm a keen Veeam fan, but I seem to find documented a lot more unsupported backup/restore caveats with the VBO product versus the competition Like Avepoint/Metallic.io etc. Am I right? Or do all the other solutions suffer from the similar caveats? Any fair insight into how these competitor products compare in reality (reviews) welcome.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2800 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: VBO versus competitors
Hi Dazza,
When public APIs for Microsoft 365 are involved, then all products working with these APIs are affected. If you need a comparison, then it would be worth contacting a Veeam sales rep with that.
Thanks!
When public APIs for Microsoft 365 are involved, then all products working with these APIs are affected. If you need a comparison, then it would be worth contacting a Veeam sales rep with that.
Thanks!
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8191
- Liked: 1322 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Mike Resseler
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: VBO versus competitors
@gingerdazza
Could you give a few examples of these backup/ restore caveats that you want to see resolved. I can't make any promises but we always try to either add the possibilities or negotiate with MSFT to give us access or the possibility to it
Could you give a few examples of these backup/ restore caveats that you want to see resolved. I can't make any promises but we always try to either add the possibilities or negotiate with MSFT to give us access or the possibility to it
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: rhys.hammond and 7 guests