Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
aeccles
Enthusiast
Posts: 82
Liked: 6 times
Joined: May 01, 2012 3:00 pm
Contact:

Any reason to have multpile ISCSI NICS on a backup proxy?

Post by aeccles »

I'm using Veeam 6.1 with ESXi 5 on with an Equallogic PS4100x SAN.

I have direct access setup and running. Question is this... Is there any benefit of having multiple ISCSI connections from the backup proxies to the SAN?

Will a single job using multiple paths?
If multiple jobs are running at the same time will it use multiple paths?
Any other pros/cons?

Thanks,
Aaron
dellock6
VeeaMVP
Posts: 6166
Liked: 1971 times
Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
Location: Varese, Italy
Contact:

Re: Any reason to have multpile ISCSI NICS on a backup proxy

Post by dellock6 »

Hi Aaron, multipathing is managed by the underlying operating system, but is usually advised to disable it since it does not work well with VBR.

Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software

@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31814
Liked: 7302 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Any reason to have multpile ISCSI NICS on a backup proxy

Post by Gostev »

Small correction, MPIO does not work well with VDDK (VMware vStorage API) when it retrieves the data from source storage - not with VBR. For example, multipathing to Veeam backup repository will work just fine.
habibalby
Veteran
Posts: 392
Liked: 33 times
Joined: Jul 18, 2011 9:30 am
Full Name: Hussain Al Sayed
Location: Bahrain
Contact:

Re: Any reason to have multpile ISCSI NICS on a backup proxy

Post by habibalby »

Advice no to go with the MPIO configuration as it will give you lots of errors. Speaking from live experience when I have implemented the initial configuration with Direct SAN.. Stay away from this type of configuration or else you will endup having Errors or Warnings.


Thanks,
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 135 guests