-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 24, 2012 3:03 pm
- Full Name: andrew
- Contact:
B&R 6.0 Physical Domain Controller as Proxy
It seems I cannot Add the Physical Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Domain Controller as a server in B&R 6.0. I get the following error:
Failed to install deployment Service......
I believe it is a permission isuue. Since it is a DC, there is no local user group.
What is the work around?
Any help would be appreciated...
Failed to install deployment Service......
I believe it is a permission isuue. Since it is a DC, there is no local user group.
What is the work around?
Any help would be appreciated...
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21137
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
Andrew, Veeam B&R is a solution for backing up virtual machines only.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 24, 2012 3:03 pm
- Full Name: andrew
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
I was told that 6.0 now has that capability..........
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 282
- Liked: 26 times
- Joined: Nov 10, 2010 6:51 pm
- Full Name: Seth Bartlett
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
It has the capability to make physical machines proxies, but not back them up.
Skype: Sethbartlett88 - Make sure to label who you are and why you want to add me
Twitter: @sethbartlett
If my post was helpful, please like it. Sometimes twitter is quicker to hit me up if you need me.
Twitter: @sethbartlett
If my post was helpful, please like it. Sometimes twitter is quicker to hit me up if you need me.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31779
- Liked: 7279 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
I think this is what OP tries to do though - leverage physical machine as a proxy or repository? He does not say anything about backing it up... if this box has lots of hard drives, why not use it backup repository for example?
I agree this is probably permissions issue - I will ask QC to try to do the same on Monday, and see if there are any issues adding DC.
I agree this is probably permissions issue - I will ask QC to try to do the same on Monday, and see if there are any issues adding DC.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 6034
- Liked: 2859 times
- Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
- Full Name: Tom Sightler
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
I've used a DC as a proxy in my lab. You simply must add it using an account that has Domain Admin permissions.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 68
- Liked: 10 times
- Joined: Aug 02, 2011 6:09 pm
- Full Name: Zach Weed
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
Yeah, I use a DC as my main proxy within my lab as well.. And have worked with countless other people who do the same. If you continue to run into issues just create a ticket at veeam.com/support.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21137
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
I was confused by the topic's title...
-
- Expert
- Posts: 141
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 27, 2010 9:43 am
- Full Name: René Frej Nielsen
- Contact:
Domain Controller as backup proxy
[merged]
Hi,
In our DR site we have an extra Domain Controller running on DR hardware (it's still on our local LAN). I'm wondering if I could use that as a backup proxy to be able to use hot add for writes when doing replication. Right now we have to use NBD for our replication target.
Is that a bad idea?
Would it require multiple vCPU or doesn't it need to any heavy processing?
Hi,
In our DR site we have an extra Domain Controller running on DR hardware (it's still on our local LAN). I'm wondering if I could use that as a backup proxy to be able to use hot add for writes when doing replication. Right now we have to use NBD for our replication target.
Is that a bad idea?
Would it require multiple vCPU or doesn't it need to any heavy processing?
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 6165
- Liked: 1971 times
- Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
- Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
- Location: Varese, Italy
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
Uhm, seems moderators merged your post by mistake, two different questions
Anyway, on replica it's better to use virtual proxies as targets, since they can use hotadd for writing in destination datastores. You cannot use SAN mode for writes...
Luca.
Anyway, on replica it's better to use virtual proxies as targets, since they can use hotadd for writing in destination datastores. You cannot use SAN mode for writes...
Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31779
- Liked: 7279 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Backing Up Physical Domain Controller
Was not me who merged this, but looks like correct merge. Both the topic above, and the merged question are about using DC as a backup proxy.
René, I don't see any issues with this approach if the DC you are talking about is virtual. Additional vCPU is always a good idea, although target proxy does not use much CPU resources unlike source one.
René, I don't see any issues with this approach if the DC you are talking about is virtual. Additional vCPU is always a good idea, although target proxy does not use much CPU resources unlike source one.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 141
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 27, 2010 9:43 am
- Full Name: René Frej Nielsen
- Contact:
Re: B&R 6.0 Physical Domain Controller as Proxy
Hi,
That sounds perfect... It's of course a virtual DC I will try it out and monitor the CPU usage and adjust vCPU as needed. Thank you!
That sounds perfect... It's of course a virtual DC I will try it out and monitor the CPU usage and adjust vCPU as needed. Thank you!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 82 guests