by mkretzer » Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:51 am people like this post
right now we are switching to per-VM backup chains and the new REFS integration. To get a fresh start we remove the backups from the config (not delete!) and then switch the REPO and do an active full. If we would need an old backup we wound rescan and use the imported backup.
What confuses me now is that our backup copy jobs still work after the active full without doing active full for the copy job as well. Is that normal or is this a problem?
by DGrinev » Fri Jan 20, 2017 1:48 pm people like this post
This is expected behavior as Backup copy job has its own separate backup chain of files. It will write all changes since last BCJ session and your active full on the source job does not trigger active full on BCJ.
by mkretzer » Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:06 pm people like this post
I slowly get the feeling there is some magic involved in BCJ... We were not able to ship the last restore point offsite because of our current REFS problems.
We had to remove the source backup from DB and had to do active full to our old NTFS repo... We thought the BCJ would definately fail now... Nope the job seems to just diff the data in some way from the new active full even with the missing restore point inbetween... How is this possible?