Actually no.. In our datacetner, comparing V8 with Update 3 to V9 with Update 1, and with the backup copy job unchanged, the time for our nightly job has been cut in more than half on the exact same hardware. A 2hr job has been running in 45-55min now on V9-Update1. I have not tested with the new feature to allow per-VM backup files yet.
Most of this thread was well prior to anyone even knowing that per-VM backups files was going to be a feature in an upcoming version so people were talking about VM's processing in parallel like then do in the main backup jobs.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 75
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010 8:16 pm
- Full Name: Monroe
- Contact:
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 32374
- Liked: 7727 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Backup Copy Jobs - Parallel Processing?
Without per-VM backup files enabled, Backup Copy jobs do not use parallel processing at allmmonroe wrote:Interesting on this thread where it was claimed that there would be no performance improvements with "parallel vm processing" on backup copy jobs yet now its a big feature and improves performance in v9. I guess we told you so, but what do silly customers/users know.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 21 guests