Hello and Good Day Team....
I have been running several forever incremental jobs, on a Windows 2016 Refs enabled repository. I do synthetic fulls weekly, for I have a 183 day restore point job. So far, so good. (knock on wood). I am noticing my increments are a bit large in size, and would like to reduce them if I could. The most obvious thing I see is I have been using the "Local Target" Storage optimization setting.I was thinking of changing it to "LAN Target" So before I test this, I ask this of the community:
1. Do changing this force me to do an active full?
2. What impacts, if any, does this have on ReFs? I know Active Fulls don't "talk" ReFS, so I need to truly have space for the Active Full. But I assume so far as ReFs goes, it business as usual from that point out?
Thanks!
Harold
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 72
- Liked: 16 times
- Joined: Jul 16, 2012 1:54 pm
- Full Name: Harold Adams
- Contact:
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27368
- Liked: 2799 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Changing Storage Optimization Level and Affects of Refs
Hello,
1. New settings will be applied after running new full backup > Changing Storage Optimization
2. Don't think there is an impact, but I can double-check it for you. If there is any impact I will update this topic in the next few days.
Thank you!
1. New settings will be applied after running new full backup > Changing Storage Optimization
2. Don't think there is an impact, but I can double-check it for you. If there is any impact I will update this topic in the next few days.
Thank you!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 72
- Liked: 16 times
- Joined: Jul 16, 2012 1:54 pm
- Full Name: Harold Adams
- Contact:
Re: Changing Storage Optimization Level and Affects of Refs
Thanks Vitaliy, I will check back later in the week.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], CoLa, marina.skobeleva and 133 guests