Availability for the Always-On Enterprise
Post Reply
mkretzer
Expert
Posts: 398
Liked: 79 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by mkretzer » Aug 21, 2017 6:48 pm

Hello,

after 6 months of again and again trying to implement REFS in production the current state (since KB4025334) is usable but not perfect. Merges after 5 weekly backups still take ~8 times the amount of time they took with the first merge but are still a little bit faster than NTFS.

My question is: will there be optimisations in update 3 from Veeam side (different block clone block size or something else) to make it more stable / get more predictable performance?

Markus

mkretzer
Expert
Posts: 398
Liked: 79 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by mkretzer » Aug 25, 2017 11:44 pm

Still no info about U3 & REFS?

ptoro
Influencer
Posts: 21
Liked: 5 times
Joined: Jul 24, 2015 4:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by ptoro » Aug 28, 2017 2:07 pm

When you say merge, do you mean synthetic full backups?

If you do mean that, did you remember to create an active full after changing over to ReFS?

tsightler
Veeam Software
Posts: 5167
Liked: 2057 times
Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
Full Name: Tom Sightler
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by tsightler » Aug 28, 2017 2:21 pm 1 person likes this post

I'm not aware of any changes coming in 9.5 U3 except for hopefully the fix for the "ERROR_BLOCK_TOO_MANY_REFERENCES" issue as this is caused by a Veeam bug/behavior.

For the other ReFS issues we are largely dependent on Microsoft for those fixes. Most customers that I've worked with are having good success with the Microsoft hotfixes + registry edits, but that is really a workaround while waiting for all of the proper fixes to get into the mainline Windows releases. Some of those fixes have made their way there, but not all of them. For now, running the hotfix + registry key changes, while having plenty of available memory, seems to be the best option.

mkretzer
Expert
Posts: 398
Liked: 79 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by mkretzer » Aug 28, 2017 2:33 pm

Hello,

but none of the fixes really adress performance. We have had 0 crashes in the last 4 months, all our issues are about performance with merges and general write IO.

Markus

tsightler
Veeam Software
Posts: 5167
Liked: 2057 times
Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
Full Name: Tom Sightler
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by tsightler » Aug 29, 2017 5:13 pm

I understand, but it doesn't change my answer. Do you have support cases open for these issues? While I've worked with some customers that saw slow merge over time, this is far from universal, and it's not currently clear to me why it happens in only some cases. I have a suspicion that it is related the the cache fix which Microsoft is still working on, as far as I know, but I don't see how anything could be changed on the Veeam side to solve this. The reason I suspect this is because, in one case, we found that if we rebooted the server on the afternoon before the merge, performance would be very fast, but would again slow over the course of weeks.

I'd be happy to look at your environment and compare to the others that I've worked with that don't have issues, see if we can find anything common. If you are interested please PM me.

DaveWatkins
Expert
Posts: 316
Liked: 82 times
Joined: Dec 13, 2015 11:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by DaveWatkins » Sep 01, 2017 6:36 am

Tom, any comments about a Veeam equivalent to Option 3 listed here
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/hel ... erver-2016

It's something specifically for DPM but presumably applies for Veeam too

kubimike
Expert
Posts: 312
Liked: 37 times
Joined: Feb 03, 2017 2:34 pm
Full Name: MikeO
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by kubimike » Sep 01, 2017 1:32 pm

tsightler wrote:I understand, but it doesn't change my answer. Do you have support cases open for these issues? While I've worked with some customers that saw slow merge over time, this is far from universal, and it's not currently clear to me why it happens in only some cases. I have a suspicion that it is related the the cache fix which Microsoft is still working on, as far as I know, but I don't see how anything could be changed on the Veeam side to solve this. The reason I suspect this is because, in one case, we found that if we rebooted the server on the afternoon before the merge, performance would be very fast, but would again slow over the course of weeks.

I'd be happy to look at your environment and compare to the others that I've worked with that don't have issues, see if we can find anything common. If you are interested please PM me.
That is the same thing I see as well!!

kubimike
Expert
Posts: 312
Liked: 37 times
Joined: Feb 03, 2017 2:34 pm
Full Name: MikeO
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by kubimike » Sep 01, 2017 1:34 pm

DaveWatkins wrote:Tom, any comments about a Veeam equivalent to Option 3 listed here

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/hel ... erver-2016

It's something specifically for DPM but presumably applies for Veeam too
Does anyone even know what a Large duplicate extents call is ?

Gostev
Veeam Software
Posts: 22804
Liked: 2801 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Current status of REFS and 9.5 update 3

Post by Gostev » Sep 03, 2017 5:25 pm

Veeam uses large block size already, so this is DPM-specific issue. We work directly with the ReFS dev team and they never saw the issue with our block size.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 36 guests