Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
pkn
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Jun 02, 2016 12:08 pm
Full Name: Patrick Keenan
Contact:

De-dup/compression compared to Avamar

Post by pkn »

Hi guys,

We are considering a solution for a customer to replace Avamar with VEEAM backup. Currently after de-dup etc 30TB is backed up to Avamar. The actual amount of backup is 57TB.

Can we expect to see similar de-dup by using VEEAM? The new backup target will be a EMC Unity box.

Thanks!
dellock6
VeeaMVP
Posts: 6166
Liked: 1971 times
Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
Location: Varese, Italy
Contact:

Re: De-dup/compression compared to Avamar

Post by dellock6 » 1 person likes this post

With the limits that every environment is different, and data reduction results may vary depending on the actual content of the protected VMs, usually you can expect at least 50% data reduction by Veeam for a full backup. Incrementals are usually not reduced too much because they only contain already unique new blocks.
Also, by using the latest version of Veeam you can leverage Bitlooker and reduce even more the amount of data to backup for windows VMs.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software

@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
jmmarton
Veeam Software
Posts: 2097
Liked: 310 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2015 2:38 am
Full Name: Joe Marton
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: De-dup/compression compared to Avamar

Post by jmmarton »

Also, I'm curious what Avamar is backing up to. You say the new target will be an EMC Unity box. What is the current target? Is it Data Domain? If so, is DD Boost being leveraged? The target also has an impact on dedupe ratios.

Joe
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Semrush [Bot], tyler.jurgens and 273 guests