Hi,
Case: 01976887
Wondering anyone could shed some light on the following. We have a new setup we are putting in top replace and older one. It consists of:
2x ESX V6 servers and vCenter (2x 1GB nic for VM traffic vSwitch0, 2x10GB Nics for iSCSI vSwitch1)
Dell EQL (2x 10GB NICs)
Physical Veeam Server (2NICs teamed for Production Network, 2 Nics not teamed with MPIO in iSCSI)
Production network and iSCSI network completely separate switches
With MPIO disbale I get a backup speed using Direct SAN of 400k (yes 400k)
Wiht MPIO enable I get 4MB/s
If I change to NBD I get 70MB/s
Something isn't right. The EQL has 3 interfaces, 2x10GB and 1 100MB nic for management. It's almost like it;s trying to use the 100MB nic but it shouldn't be, the iSCSI initiator on the Veeam server uses the Group IP in the iSCSI network.
I am sure it;s something simple but I have been looking at too long now to see it. IOPS testing from a VM on the ESX cluster show very good performance so it;s just Veeam -> EQL that is slow.
Any advice welcome.
Matt
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 211
- Liked: 21 times
- Joined: May 30, 2012 11:58 am
- Full Name: Matt Peek
- Contact:
Direct SAN much slower than NBD
Matt Peek
VMCE 2021
VMCE 2021
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6551
- Liked: 765 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Direct SAN much slower than NBD
Hi,
What transport mode does the job reports? Do you see "[san]" in the logs?
Thanks
What transport mode does the job reports? Do you see "[san]" in the logs?
Thanks
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 211
- Liked: 21 times
- Joined: May 30, 2012 11:58 am
- Full Name: Matt Peek
- Contact:
Re: Direct SAN much slower than NBD
Hi,
Yes if I set the local proxy to be "Auto" I get SAN and 400k. If force it to NBD then I get 70MB/s.
Thanks,
Matt
Yes if I set the local proxy to be "Auto" I get SAN and 400k. If force it to NBD then I get 70MB/s.
Thanks,
Matt
Matt Peek
VMCE 2021
VMCE 2021
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Direct SAN much slower than NBD
I'd continue looking into this with support. Probably involving Dell engineers would be required.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 120 guests