Hello,
in our Datacenter old storage systems often are used as "best effort backup repositories" to host backups that might be useful to have a longer retention on but where it would cost too much to purchase a dedicated system.
Currently we are decommissioning our old 600 TB primary backup system. Power-wise the system is still acceptable (many large drives) so we want to use it to hold part of our primary backups longer.
Problem is that the only way to do this with Veeam currently would be installing something like MinIO to use the Archive Tier functionality of SOBR.
It would be extremely useful if this archive tier functionality would be expanded to normal block (XFS) storage.
Markus
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1279
- Liked: 459 times
- Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 10757
- Liked: 2926 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature request: Archive Tier on block storage (XFS)
Hi Markus,
Why not simply use a Backup Copy Job with long GFS retention on this repository machine?
That would also achieve your goal of keeping backups for a longer period.
Is there a specific reason it needs to be a Archive Tier in SOBR?
Best,
Fabian
Why not simply use a Backup Copy Job with long GFS retention on this repository machine?
That would also achieve your goal of keeping backups for a longer period.
Is there a specific reason it needs to be a Archive Tier in SOBR?
Best,
Fabian
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 32395
- Liked: 7761 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature request: Archive Tier on block storage (XFS)
Hi, Markus. Both SOBR Capacity Tier and Archive Tier work in tandem leveraging object storage capabilities, so it's a basically a full redesign followed by a long stabilization cycle to swap object storage to XFS.
At the same time, Backup Copy jobs to normal XFS repository is already available today, the tech is solid and proven with time, so why do anything else in the first place?
P.S. Fabian beat me to that.
At the same time, Backup Copy jobs to normal XFS repository is already available today, the tech is solid and proven with time, so why do anything else in the first place?
P.S. Fabian beat me to that.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1279
- Liked: 459 times
- Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
- Contact:
Re: Feature request: Archive Tier on block storage (XFS)
@Mildur Problem is our change rate is high. So we will loose the main benefit of only holding old backup points. For us that means we have the newest backups on the primary, copy and the "archive" system and we will loose much of its capacity.
With the requested feature it would be possible to optimally use a system as another layer of safety further reducing the need for tape restores.
Having the newest backup one more time is just wasteful and inefficient.
With the requested feature it would be possible to optimally use a system as another layer of safety further reducing the need for tape restores.
Having the newest backup one more time is just wasteful and inefficient.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 27 guests