I would like to see petabytes listed as PB rather than larger numbers of TB... For example, my 8.2PB repository would not be listed as 8338.0TB...
-Thanks!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jun 06, 2016 6:12 pm
- Full Name: Eric J. Farrar
- Contact:
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: (Feature Request)Petabyte+ repository showing in TB
Hello Eric!
That`s an impressive number
I agree that we need to update that. Thanks for the request!
That`s an impressive number
I agree that we need to update that. Thanks for the request!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 58
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Apr 23, 2014 9:51 am
- Full Name: Andy Goldschmidt
- Contact:
Re: (Feature Request)Petabyte+ repository showing in TB
out of interest, what type of Repo are you using? That must be quite a beast of storage.
-= VMCE v9 certified =-
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jun 06, 2016 6:12 pm
- Full Name: Eric J. Farrar
- Contact:
Re: (Feature Request)Petabyte+ repository showing in TB
Most of my repo's are on 3PAR arrays. I have multiple 16TB volumes on each physical proxy and with the exception of one dedicated to EndPoint Backup clients, all others are pooled into a single scale-out repository.
My 8.2PB repository is on a Windows Server 2012 R2 cluster of four couplets - each couplet is an HA failover couplet with 70x 16TB disks behind them in RAID 6 segmets of 8 disks (DAS). This ends up as a formatted 3.1PB of space, but the thin provisioned virtual volume (in software RAID 5) across all segments of all couplets ends up as 8.2PB - I could have oversubscribed it out to 40PB but not enough to see an EB (which was what I was hoping for actually).
My 8.2PB repository is on a Windows Server 2012 R2 cluster of four couplets - each couplet is an HA failover couplet with 70x 16TB disks behind them in RAID 6 segmets of 8 disks (DAS). This ends up as a formatted 3.1PB of space, but the thin provisioned virtual volume (in software RAID 5) across all segments of all couplets ends up as 8.2PB - I could have oversubscribed it out to 40PB but not enough to see an EB (which was what I was hoping for actually).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 71 guests