Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
davidshq
Enthusiast
Posts: 69
Liked: never
Joined: Mar 16, 2009 4:01 pm
Full Name: David Mackey
Contact:

Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by davidshq » Nov 30, 2009 5:26 pm

So, I love Veeam (I think I've said that once or twice before) - but I've thought of a feature that I do not believe is currently implemented but would provide a huge advantage to Veeam's customers: allow us to see in one view all of our virtual machines and whether they are protected (e.g. have a scheduled backup) or not. Right now if someone adds another vm to one of the machines (they shouldn't, but it can happen) - there is no way for me to tell that I need to be backing up another vm unless that individual tells me (which may not always happen). To be notified of unprotected machines would be great - and then the ability to decide to ignore this alarm for that machine or not (for example, if its just a test machine that doesn't need to be backed up).
Dave.

Gostev
SVP, Product Management
Posts: 23876
Liked: 3210 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by Gostev » Nov 30, 2009 8:09 pm

Hi Dave, yes fully agree. I have added this feature myself to the feature tracker a few weeks ago. It is logical to add to our reporting web UI. Thanks for verifying the need for this feature :D

davidshq
Enthusiast
Posts: 69
Liked: never
Joined: Mar 16, 2009 4:01 pm
Full Name: David Mackey
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by davidshq » Dec 01, 2009 5:06 pm

Great. Thanks.
Dave.

nik24
Lurker
Posts: 2
Liked: never
Joined: Oct 30, 2009 5:11 am
Full Name: Nikolai
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by nik24 » Jun 17, 2011 5:44 am

Is this feature still on the roadmap? We love Veeam, but the reporting side is lacking a lot and this particular feature I think is very important. With hundreds of VMs it is extremely hard to know which VMs are protected and which are not without doing a manual audit.

Vitaliy S.
Product Manager
Posts: 22131
Liked: 1382 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by Vitaliy S. » Jun 17, 2011 12:29 pm

Yes, it is still on the roadmap. Thanks.

Doug.Butler
Enthusiast
Posts: 30
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Jun 22, 2011 10:41 pm
Full Name: Douglas J. Butler
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by Doug.Butler » Jun 22, 2011 10:45 pm

Vitaliy S. wrote:Yes, it is still on the roadmap. Thanks.
Is there a site or document that is open to customers to see the list of features on the roadmap, and some kind of estimate on when you anticipate implementing them?

I realize that features and release plans are subject to change (see your DISCLAIMER: message below) :) but I was still hoping you might publish a current "engineering change request" queue of some kind.

Thanks!

Vitaliy S.
Product Manager
Posts: 22131
Liked: 1382 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by Vitaliy S. » Jun 23, 2011 11:17 am

Hello Douglas,

Please have a look at this topic for the answer: Re: 4.1 is here, what about further roadmaps? (Anton's answer still applies to our current position).

Thank you.

Gostev
SVP, Product Management
Posts: 23876
Liked: 3210 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by Gostev » Jun 23, 2011 2:33 pm

Basically, we have the same strategy as Apple regarding roadmap and future plans. Particularly, this helps to stay significantly ahead of competition, and thus does much more good than bad to the company overall. But there are other, smaller reasons for this too.

I can say that "engineering change request" queue is about 200 features now, so should be enough for next 3-5 years (but the features are still coming in). So it may take a while for specific features to get implemented. We are doing our best to prioritize features based on number of requests and value to the product though. And so far we've been doing good job I think.

flavor4real
Expert
Posts: 205
Liked: 5 times
Joined: Nov 22, 2010 7:57 pm
Full Name: DS
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by flavor4real » Jun 24, 2011 1:43 pm

I agree that this would be a great feature!

Many times the VM Administrators setup VM's and forget to tell the Backup administrators to include the new VM's. This happen a lot to me. Even If I don;t get blamed for it, this is unnecessary stress on the VM admin itself. Having this feature would reflect a great administrative control over new VM's backup implementation.

Thanks,

m.novelli
Veeam ProPartner
Posts: 346
Liked: 40 times
Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
Full Name: Marco Novelli
Location: Asti - Italy
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by m.novelli » Jun 27, 2011 3:04 pm

+1

Marco

tigerplish
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Mar 22, 2010 11:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.

Post by tigerplish » Jun 27, 2011 4:04 pm

One thing I've done is I backup by Resource Pools, not individual VMs. This way, the onus is on the admins (I'm one of them too ;o). There are two Pools that aren't backed up -- Build Room, and Unused.

It's amazing how little gaps we now have since I made that change. Basically the thought was "You want your junk backed up? Put it in the correct resource pool"

That said, I like the suggestion in this thread. By all means, please do!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 30 guests