-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 69
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 16, 2009 4:01 pm
- Full Name: David Mackey
- Contact:
Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
So, I love Veeam (I think I've said that once or twice before) - but I've thought of a feature that I do not believe is currently implemented but would provide a huge advantage to Veeam's customers: allow us to see in one view all of our virtual machines and whether they are protected (e.g. have a scheduled backup) or not. Right now if someone adds another vm to one of the machines (they shouldn't, but it can happen) - there is no way for me to tell that I need to be backing up another vm unless that individual tells me (which may not always happen). To be notified of unprotected machines would be great - and then the ability to decide to ignore this alarm for that machine or not (for example, if its just a test machine that doesn't need to be backed up).
Dave.
Dave.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31773
- Liked: 7274 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Hi Dave, yes fully agree. I have added this feature myself to the feature tracker a few weeks ago. It is logical to add to our reporting web UI. Thanks for verifying the need for this feature
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 69
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 16, 2009 4:01 pm
- Full Name: David Mackey
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Great. Thanks.
Dave.
Dave.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 30, 2009 5:11 am
- Full Name: Nikolai
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Is this feature still on the roadmap? We love Veeam, but the reporting side is lacking a lot and this particular feature I think is very important. With hundreds of VMs it is extremely hard to know which VMs are protected and which are not without doing a manual audit.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27359
- Liked: 2788 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Yes, it is still on the roadmap. Thanks.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 30
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Jun 22, 2011 10:41 pm
- Full Name: Douglas J. Butler
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Is there a site or document that is open to customers to see the list of features on the roadmap, and some kind of estimate on when you anticipate implementing them?Vitaliy S. wrote:Yes, it is still on the roadmap. Thanks.
I realize that features and release plans are subject to change (see your DISCLAIMER: message below) but I was still hoping you might publish a current "engineering change request" queue of some kind.
Thanks!
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27359
- Liked: 2788 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Hello Douglas,
Please have a look at this topic for the answer: Re: 4.1 is here, what about further roadmaps? (Anton's answer still applies to our current position).
Thank you.
Please have a look at this topic for the answer: Re: 4.1 is here, what about further roadmaps? (Anton's answer still applies to our current position).
Thank you.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31773
- Liked: 7274 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
Basically, we have the same strategy as Apple regarding roadmap and future plans. Particularly, this helps to stay significantly ahead of competition, and thus does much more good than bad to the company overall. But there are other, smaller reasons for this too.
I can say that "engineering change request" queue is about 200 features now, so should be enough for next 3-5 years (but the features are still coming in). So it may take a while for specific features to get implemented. We are doing our best to prioritize features based on number of requests and value to the product though. And so far we've been doing good job I think.
I can say that "engineering change request" queue is about 200 features now, so should be enough for next 3-5 years (but the features are still coming in). So it may take a while for specific features to get implemented. We are doing our best to prioritize features based on number of requests and value to the product though. And so far we've been doing good job I think.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 205
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Nov 22, 2010 7:57 pm
- Full Name: DS
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
I agree that this would be a great feature!
Many times the VM Administrators setup VM's and forget to tell the Backup administrators to include the new VM's. This happen a lot to me. Even If I don;t get blamed for it, this is unnecessary stress on the VM admin itself. Having this feature would reflect a great administrative control over new VM's backup implementation.
Thanks,
Many times the VM Administrators setup VM's and forget to tell the Backup administrators to include the new VM's. This happen a lot to me. Even If I don;t get blamed for it, this is unnecessary stress on the VM admin itself. Having this feature would reflect a great administrative control over new VM's backup implementation.
Thanks,
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 559
- Liked: 103 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
-
- Novice
- Posts: 3
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 22, 2010 11:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Unprotected VM Notification.
One thing I've done is I backup by Resource Pools, not individual VMs. This way, the onus is on the admins (I'm one of them too ;o). There are two Pools that aren't backed up -- Build Room, and Unused.
It's amazing how little gaps we now have since I made that change. Basically the thought was "You want your junk backed up? Put it in the correct resource pool"
That said, I like the suggestion in this thread. By all means, please do!
It's amazing how little gaps we now have since I made that change. Basically the thought was "You want your junk backed up? Put it in the correct resource pool"
That said, I like the suggestion in this thread. By all means, please do!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AM1, jose.rivas, restore-helper, Semrush [Bot], tyler.jurgens and 56 guests