Hi there,
Wanted to know from you guys if I should expect slow performance on this sequence or action? I've noticed that the merge with FastClone takes a really, really long time to run and complete, is there a way to improve that performance, and for example what kind of resources are used to get that done?
Thanks in advance
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 55
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 23, 2019 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Jaques Coetsee
- Contact:
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 55
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 23, 2019 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Jaques Coetsee
- Contact:
Re: Full backup merge (Fast Clone)
Just to add, the disks in question where this is taking long are REFS disks so I should benefit from super fast FastClone process however I am not. I also see some disks configured with 4K cluster size instead of the recommended 64k so I would assume that also makes a difference ?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 55
- Liked: never
- Joined: Oct 23, 2019 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Jaques Coetsee
- Contact:
Re: Full backup merge (Fast Clone)
Anybody got any insight on the above maybe ?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 9848
- Liked: 2607 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Full backup merge (Fast Clone)
64k for refs is recommended. What is the bottleneck in the job statistics?
FastClone should not take a long time.
FastClone should not take a long time.
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20413
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Full backup merge (Fast Clone)
Agree with Fabian here, the provided performance looks suspicious, so might stand to reason to reach our support team for further investigation. Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 83 guests