Improving backup speed and time window / duration

Availability for the Always-On Enterprise

Re: Improving backup speed and time window / duration

Veeam Logoby ACC » Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:33 pm

sanjaykrk wrote:For Reverse, disadvantage: its slow.

Reverse incremental is slow because raid 5 and spinning disks as said aren't friends with a continuous high random IO workload, however would replace it with raid 0/1/10 with ssds or even better nvme-ssds it would be fast because an enterprise ssd is very capable handling such workload. Lets say the disks Albertwt is using can do 100 IOs (im rounding up) and have perfect schaling the array handles 1200 IOs. One Intel DC P3700 2TB ssd is rated at 450k IOs read / 175k IOs write, even if Veeam is only able to sqeeze a quarter of the rated performance from the P3700 it outperforms the spinning disk array with ease. However most backup budgets doesnt allow to spend a couple grand on a highend enterprise ssd.

Reverse incremental:
Pro: last backup is the full backup, storage use is very stable.
Con: backup is in essence two operations (backup and merge) combined in one operation which tend to be high random IO workload.

Forever forward incremental:
Pro: storage use is stable, backup is usually sequential IO workload, merge happens when backup is done.
con: merge tend to be random IO workload.

Forward incremental:
Pro: backup is usually sequential IO workload, creating (synthetic) full backups tend to be sequential IO workload, no merge operations.
con: storage use fluctuates based on settings.
ACC
Influencer
 
Posts: 24
Liked: 5 times
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:38 am
Full Name: ACC

Re: Improving backup speed and time window / duration

Veeam Logoby foggy » Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:49 am 1 person likes this post

Sanjay, your understanding of the backup methods is correct.
foggy
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 14728
Liked: 1078 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

Previous

Return to Veeam Backup & Replication



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], matt1237, Yahoo [Bot] and 17 guests