I noticed that the first reversed backup was completed faster then the first full Incremental backup for the same VM.
Is that always true? May be it is my particular case...
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 78
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010 5:30 am
- Full Name: Dmitry Prokudin
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27347
- Liked: 2785 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Is reversed backup faster then incremental backup?
Dmitry,
No, there is no difference in running first full backup for forward and reversed incremental modes, both runs are exactly the same. I guess you've checked that out on different VMs with different destination storage, am I right?
Thank you!
No, there is no difference in running first full backup for forward and reversed incremental modes, both runs are exactly the same. I guess you've checked that out on different VMs with different destination storage, am I right?
Thank you!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 78
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010 5:30 am
- Full Name: Dmitry Prokudin
Re: Is reversed backup faster then incremental backup?
Yes, you are right, I checked it out on the same VM, but with different destination storages.
The retest shows that "both runs are exactly the same".
The retest shows that "both runs are exactly the same".
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27347
- Liked: 2785 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Is reversed backup faster then incremental backup?
That's what I've thought.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dejan.ilic, kyle.shuberg and 92 guests