Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
JamesNT
Service Provider
Posts: 71
Liked: 18 times
Joined: Feb 15, 2016 2:28 pm
Full Name: James Summerlin
Contact:

Merge time sucks

Post by JamesNT »

The forever incremental requires merging which is taking a very, very, very --- let me put it this way:
vvvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
long time for some clients. We typically use either USB drives or QNap devices for onsite backup repositories. Would we be better off to switch to having an Active Full backup every Sunday with incrementals between the full backups to avoid the horror of merge?

JamesNT
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Merge time sucks

Post by HannesK » 1 person likes this post

Hello,

yes, periodic active full is the way to go on slow storage systems to avoid merges.

QNAP could act as block device with REFS /XFS https://www.veeam.com/blog/advanced-ref ... suite.html

REFS is not supported for USB drives.

Best regards,
Hannes
JamesNT
Service Provider
Posts: 71
Liked: 18 times
Joined: Feb 15, 2016 2:28 pm
Full Name: James Summerlin
Contact:

Re: Merge time sucks

Post by JamesNT »

Hannes,

So I should be able to leave my current settings as it, just check the box for Full Back and set to every Sunday?

James
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Merge time sucks

Post by HannesK »

yep, correct
JamesNT
Service Provider
Posts: 71
Liked: 18 times
Joined: Feb 15, 2016 2:28 pm
Full Name: James Summerlin
Contact:

Re: Merge time sucks

Post by JamesNT »

Excellent. Thank you for your time.

JamesNT
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 114 guests