We currently have an HPE StoreOnce backup target and offload to Wasabi. The StoreOnce is getting pretty old and looking to replace it but wondering if I should do a dedup appliance again or just move to a lot of storage and use Veeam dedup/compression? I'm guessing pricing won't be a lot different since these appliances are expensive and I could get much better performance with traditional storage.
If I did do traditional storage what is the best way to size that?
-
gstrouth
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 08, 2021 10:41 pm
- Full Name: Gerard Strouth
- Contact:
-
HannesK
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14322
- Liked: 2890 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: On-Prem backup target storage
Hello,
clear answer: plain storage. Cheaper and faster. Server with internal disks is recommended. Your preferred server vendor should be able to offer proper configurations. As you mentioned HPE, that would be Apollo server (or the DL345 for smaller scale)
I like to refer to about REFS / XFS space savings (except you do active full)
post461847.html#p461847
post368308.html#p368308
Easiest sizing can be done with https://calculator.veeam.com/vbr/
Best regards,
Hannes
clear answer: plain storage. Cheaper and faster. Server with internal disks is recommended. Your preferred server vendor should be able to offer proper configurations. As you mentioned HPE, that would be Apollo server (or the DL345 for smaller scale)
I like to refer to about REFS / XFS space savings (except you do active full)
post461847.html#p461847
post368308.html#p368308
Easiest sizing can be done with https://calculator.veeam.com/vbr/
Best regards,
Hannes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 116 guests