Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
dmitri-va
Enthusiast
Posts: 58
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Jun 01, 2015 1:28 pm
Full Name: Dmitri
Contact:

Physical Linux server as proxy and non-hardened repository?

Post by dmitri-va »

This is supported, right?

If so, XFS (faster?) or ZFS (compression on top of vbr compression/dedup?)?

Ubuntu vs RHEL, any pros/cons?

Proxy/Repo server will be connected to a SAN via iSCSI and vmware vCenter for a SAN mode.

Thanks.
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14844
Liked: 3086 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Physical Linux server as proxy and non-hardened repository?

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
yes, Linux proxy on a Linux repository (except Hardened Repository) is supported.

XFS: because of block cloning

Ubuntu: because it does not force you to upgrade every few months (except you have the right support option from Red Hat)

Best regards,
Hannes
dmitri-va
Enthusiast
Posts: 58
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Jun 01, 2015 1:28 pm
Full Name: Dmitri
Contact:

Re: Physical Linux server as proxy and non-hardened repository?

Post by dmitri-va »

appreciate the reponses!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FrancWest, stephen.mintrom and 25 guests