Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

hi,
i want to know why using SAN and not NAS in veeam V7?
thx
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27116
Liked: 2720 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Can you please elaborate what do you mean by "why using SAN and not NAS"?
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

I read everywhere that we should use the SAN rather than the NAS, so I wanted to know why we might to use it?
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27116
Liked: 2720 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Can you please tell me in what use cases it is written to use SAN and not a NAS device? SAN is generally referred to source storage, storage where you store your production VMs. As to NAS usage, then it is commonly used as destination target for the backup/backup copy jobs.
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

I would like to set up a remote backup topology and in this case use a nas to make a backup of my Vm then send my snapshot on a off site...
Do you understand me?
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by veremin »

Unfortunately, it’s still not clear what you’re trying to achieve. You’re going to use NAS device as a primary backup repository and, then, copy the corresponding backup data offsite, right?

Thanks.
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

yes it s :wink: so i want to know if it's possible to use just NAS and not SAN in this case?
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27116
Liked: 2720 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Yes, you can do that. Moreover, you can use any type of storage to store your backups.
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

ok but i don t understand why the documentation in Veeam tell to use a SAN and not a NAS then?
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by veremin »

As to the scenario in general, you can use local backup job that will write backup data to the said NAS device, and, then, specify this job as a source for backup copy job that will copy resulting backup files offsite.

Thanks.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by veremin »

ok but i don t understand why the documentation in Veeam tell to use a SAN and not a NAS
Can you point us to the documentation you're referring to? Thanks.
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

i found this here:http://www.veeam.com/vm-backup-features.html

Thx for your advices :)
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21070
Liked: 2115 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by foggy »

Most likely you're referring to direct SAN access transport mode used to retrieve source VM data directly from production storage over SAN fabric. This has nothing to do with the target storage, where you're going to place backup files. Is this where the confusion comes from?
faco1989
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 18, 2014 1:05 pm
Full Name: barbencon
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by faco1989 »

i think it can solve my problem yeah ;) thx a lot for your help so :)
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by veremin » 2 people like this post

Feel free to ask for further clarification, should need be. Thanks.
tsands
Novice
Posts: 5
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 03, 2011 2:06 pm
Full Name: Tyson
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by tsands »

I just moved a client to the Thecus N8850 Top Tower. We were attempting to do GFS backup copies but the lower end NAS we had prior to the Thecus couldn't handle the IO. I used the NAS charts and filtered by backup at http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/rankers/ ... g/?rank=86 to make the decision. Also when choosing a device to store your backups on, you want to keep in mind how quickly you want to be able to recover your data. I've been doubling back on total size of VM's and calculating the transfer (read) rates to get an idea of how long it would take to recover specific VMs based on the speed of the NAS, accounting for the total IO of the drives minus the RAID overhead.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31541
Liked: 6714 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: SAN vs. NAS

Post by Gostev »

When it comes to IOPS, it's all about the number of spindles... all other things do not matter that much. 8-bay NAS will always beat 6-bay NAS, and will always be beaten by 10-bay NAS :D despite of their rank on any comparison.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], lindasz0112, Noushad, Semrush [Bot], slackhouse and 143 guests