-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 40
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2011 2:12 pm
- Full Name: Olivier Druard
- Contact:
Saves due to WAN Accelerators
Hello,
We have already implemented Backup Copy jobs through wan, using Veeam WAN Accelerator servers, from several sites world wide to the central datacenter.
It works, and we need now to continue deployment on other sites.
However, we don't know if the WAN bandwith will be high enough for all sites. On somme of them, the bandwith is not sufficient to send daily the native size of the backup, but maybe the WAN Accelerators will allow the copy.
Is there a way to know the actual saves due to WAN Accelerators on already running Backup Copy jobs ?
Either in console (but I didn't see it), or with PowerShell (I would prefer), or even in logs (worse case)...
I we could estimate the bandwith saves due to WAN on current jobs, we could extrapolate the needed bandwith for next ones.
Thanks for your advices.
Olivier
We have already implemented Backup Copy jobs through wan, using Veeam WAN Accelerator servers, from several sites world wide to the central datacenter.
It works, and we need now to continue deployment on other sites.
However, we don't know if the WAN bandwith will be high enough for all sites. On somme of them, the bandwith is not sufficient to send daily the native size of the backup, but maybe the WAN Accelerators will allow the copy.
Is there a way to know the actual saves due to WAN Accelerators on already running Backup Copy jobs ?
Either in console (but I didn't see it), or with PowerShell (I would prefer), or even in logs (worse case)...
I we could estimate the bandwith saves due to WAN on current jobs, we could extrapolate the needed bandwith for next ones.
Thanks for your advices.
Olivier
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31806
- Liked: 7300 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Saves due to WAN Accelerators
Hello Olivier, you can see this information in the job's email report for each session. Thanks!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 40
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2011 2:12 pm
- Full Name: Olivier Druard
- Contact:
Re: Saves due to WAN Accelerators
Thanks for answer.
So far, we didn't use mail. I configured a mail on one job to check.
However I'll need to agregate results for about 60 jobs, and repeat operation several times this year, then I'd like to find another way which could be used in a script.
Olivier
So far, we didn't use mail. I configured a mail on one job to check.
However I'll need to agregate results for about 60 jobs, and repeat operation several times this year, then I'd like to find another way which could be used in a script.
Olivier
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31806
- Liked: 7300 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Saves due to WAN Accelerators
I am pretty sure Veeam ONE can create such a report for you... I'll double check with the corresponding PM.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Saves due to WAN Accelerators
Hi Olivier,
there is a predefined Veeam ONE report called Backup Copy Job which includes Accelerators Details table. The table provides details for each pair of WAN accelerators used by backup copy jobs: number of restore points transferred, amount of data read from the source repository, actual amount of data transferred to the target repository and amount of saved traffic
there is a predefined Veeam ONE report called Backup Copy Job which includes Accelerators Details table. The table provides details for each pair of WAN accelerators used by backup copy jobs: number of restore points transferred, amount of data read from the source repository, actual amount of data transferred to the target repository and amount of saved traffic
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 40
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 25, 2011 2:12 pm
- Full Name: Olivier Druard
- Contact:
Re: Saves due to WAN Accelerators
Hello,
I got it ! Thanks a lot.
I got it ! Thanks a lot.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 232 guests