Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
jlhall1000
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Mar 17, 2017 11:06 am
Full Name: Jason Hall
Contact:

Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by jlhall1000 » Mar 17, 2017 12:20 pm

We have recently just purchased Veeam and im looking at the best way to manage our backup storage.

My Veeam backup repository is a virtual Windows 2012 server.

I have a Compellent SAN with 7k disks to store the backups too and im just trying to work out the best way to present the storage to Veeam.

Do i;
  • Present a large lun (e.g. 20tb) to the server and setup the backup repository on this.
    Present multiple 2tb luns and create a single spanned volume in Windows.
    Present multiple 2tb luns and use Scale-out backup repositories.
Has anyone seen performance issues with a large LUN with slow disks?

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5320
Liked: 468 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by P.Tide » Mar 17, 2017 2:58 pm

Hi,

That depends:
Present a large lun (e.g. 20tb) to the server and setup the backup repository on this.
How do you aggregate them?
Present multiple 2tb luns and use Scale-out backup repositories.
What license do you have on VBR?

Thanks

jlhall1000
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Mar 17, 2017 11:06 am
Full Name: Jason Hall
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by jlhall1000 » Mar 17, 2017 3:15 pm

Thank you for the response,

The SAN has 42 disks in a Raid 10 with raid tiering.

We have the enterprise plus license so i believe we have the scale out repository capability.

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5320
Liked: 468 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by P.Tide » Mar 17, 2017 3:35 pm

Then I'd go with the first option. Just make sure that you present it to the repository server directly via FC or iSCSI.

Thank you.

mkretzer
Expert
Posts: 566
Liked: 127 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by mkretzer » Mar 18, 2017 8:46 am

But you would only have one IO queue. We use striping / spanned volumes alot and it works good...

Shestakov
Veeam Software
Posts: 7009
Liked: 717 times
Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by Shestakov » Mar 19, 2017 5:46 pm

Markus, you may enable multiple write streams in this case.
Although your option looks good for me.

mkretzer
Expert
Posts: 566
Liked: 127 times
Joined: Dec 17, 2015 7:17 am
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by mkretzer » Mar 19, 2017 8:13 pm

Where do you change that?
This still would not change the queues per device :-)

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5320
Liked: 468 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanned volume vs Scale-out Repositories

Post by P.Tide » Mar 20, 2017 11:09 am

AFAIK there is nothing wrong with a single queue if the OS that the storage is connected to applies an appropriate IO scheduling algorithm. There is a whitepaper that provides some performance tuning recommendations for Linux systems that use Compellent. I believe that there should be a similar tuning guide for Windows systems as well, or at least Dell engineers should be able to provide some recommendations on that matter.

Thanks

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests