- Posts: 261
- Liked: 29 times
- Joined: May 03, 2011 12:51 pm
- Full Name: James Pearce
It appears to me that the above field is calculated based on the job average rather than the VM average throughput? And also that is is truncated to hours only.
To me it seems that the accuracy of this could be much better, especially in the case that a VM has been added to a replication job otherwise running via CBT, by basing the estimate on the average throughput being attained for the specific VM being replicated. And also, sometimes this could be more than 24 hours.
- Product Manager
- Posts: 21998
- Liked: 1351 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
There are two panes where you can observe time remaining statistics (one is for entire job, another one is for VMs being processed), however job related indicators are still affected by VM average throughput.
Anyway, I agree that this should be improved, thanks for the feedback, much appreciated.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests