-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 94
- Liked: 6 times
- Joined: Apr 21, 2011 7:37 pm
- Contact:
Unofficial Veeam/Windows 2012 dedupe recommendations
It sounds like the folks at Veeam have spent fair amount of time working with the new dedupe features of Windows 2012 and are excited with the results. With that work, is there any "unofficial" recommendations regarding the configuration of Windows dedupe or Veeam jobs that are written to a dedupe volume? Or, is setting the Veeam jobs to low compression and leaving 2012 dedupe on the defaults been the path taken?
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31816
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Veeam/Windows 2012 dedupe recommendations
Just like for any other dedupe storage:
Forward incremental backup mode
Veeam compression OFF or LOW
Veeam dedupe ON
As far as Windows 2012 dedupe settings, there is not many of those except actual dedupe process scheduling...
Forward incremental backup mode
Veeam compression OFF or LOW
Veeam dedupe ON
As far as Windows 2012 dedupe settings, there is not many of those except actual dedupe process scheduling...
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 88
- Liked: 25 times
- Joined: Sep 25, 2012 7:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Veeam/Windows 2012 dedupe recommendations
you want Veeam dedupe ON when writing to dedupe storage?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Veeam/Windows 2012 dedupe recommendations
Yes. We have a brilliant explanation by Tom and a couple of other existing topics regarding this:
Dedup device for Veeam backups
Recommended settings when using a dedupe appliance
Please take a look.
Dedup device for Veeam backups
Recommended settings when using a dedupe appliance
Please take a look.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 88
- Liked: 25 times
- Joined: Sep 25, 2012 7:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Veeam/Windows 2012 dedupe recommendations
awesome, thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 85 guests