The best practices and deployment guide for v7 states that WAN accelerators should be used when leveraging backup copy jobs to get backups to a remote site over a slow WAN link.
I don't have Enterprise plus for the WAN accelerators.
I will be using a virtual Veeam server with all roles writing to local vmdk repositories at my primary site. There will be a NAS device at the secondary site to receive backup copy job data.
In this scenario, should I have a proxy in each site in order to get the best performance for my backup copy jobs?
Thanks in advance.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 80
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Apr 16, 2012 11:44 am
- Full Name: Justin Adams
- Location: United States
- Contact:
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Using Backup Copy for offsite.
Hello Justin,
It depends on how your NAS is added to Veeam B&R console.
If it is added as a CIFS share, you need to configure some server to play a role of a proxying server for the CIFS repository.
If it`s not a share, you will have no proxy servers, the data flow will be: Disk > Source backup repository > Network > Target backup repository > Disk.
Here are visual examples. Thank you.
It depends on how your NAS is added to Veeam B&R console.
If it is added as a CIFS share, you need to configure some server to play a role of a proxying server for the CIFS repository.
If it`s not a share, you will have no proxy servers, the data flow will be: Disk > Source backup repository > Network > Target backup repository > Disk.
Here are visual examples. Thank you.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Using Backup Copy for offsite.
Please also note that storing backup data on VMFS is not considered as best practice.jadams159 wrote:I will be using a virtual Veeam server with all roles writing to local vmdk repositories at my primary site.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 86 guests