Availability for the Always-On Enterprise
Post Reply
burak
Influencer
Posts: 18
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 28, 2015 8:35 am
Full Name: Burak
Contact:

Using Server 2008 R2 instead of Server 2016 for Veeam B&R

Post by burak » Nov 06, 2017 7:04 pm

Hello,

are there any advantages for using Windows Server 2016 for Veeam B&R Management instead of Server 2008 R2?
Currently, Veeam B&R is installed on a Hyper-V host which backups two hosts on a NAS repository. Another dedicated server with Server 2008 R2 is available, which could manage the Veeam backup jobs. Does I lose any features that are only available by using Server 2016?

Thanks
Burak

prewest
Service Provider
Posts: 40
Liked: 5 times
Joined: May 05, 2015 2:30 pm
Full Name: Arnold van Blanken
Contact:

Re: Using Server 2008 R2 instead of Server 2016 for Veeam B&

Post by prewest » Nov 07, 2017 7:37 am

I found out that if you are using REFS in the vm`s that you are backing up, you cannot open them on 2008r2 or 2012r2 (REFS version of 2016 release).
Other than that, there should be no problems.

burak
Influencer
Posts: 18
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 28, 2015 8:35 am
Full Name: Burak
Contact:

Re: Using Server 2008 R2 instead of Server 2016 for Veeam B&

Post by burak » Nov 07, 2017 8:02 am

ReFS is not used as file systme inside of the VMs but is used on the storage that holding the VMs on both Hyper-V hosts. So, I think this isn't a problem?

DGrinev
Veeam Software
Posts: 1218
Liked: 128 times
Joined: Dec 01, 2016 3:49 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Grinev
Location: St.Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Using Server 2008 R2 instead of Server 2016 for Veeam B&

Post by DGrinev » Nov 07, 2017 12:57 pm

Hi Burak,

You should be ok with the described scenario, also review this thread about ReFS and 2016 Host, it might be useful. Thanks!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrentBPPI, darmarko and 56 guests