Is the ability to target specific VMs in a backup copy going to put back in to V12 at some point? How we target backups and how we organize copies is completely different, meaning any one backup job could have several copies associated with it targeting specific VMs. Having to work out which copies are effected and add an exclusion every time we add a new VM to the backup isn't realistic.
Also, is the ability to retain quarterly restore points coming back? This is something we use extensively for long term retention copies, but seems to now be missing even for Legacy Backup Copies.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 05, 2024 10:55 am
- Full Name: Mark
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 9568
- Liked: 2538 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: V12 - Target specific VMs for copies
Hi Mark
Q1:
Please see the comments in the following forum topic:
veeam-backup-replication-f2/from-infras ... 85444.html
Q2:
This functionality was already removed for backup/backup copy jobs in V11 if I remember correctly. There are no plans to bring it back. But we will add your feedback to the others. We got the request from time to time.
Best,
Fabian
Q1:
Please see the comments in the following forum topic:
veeam-backup-replication-f2/from-infras ... 85444.html
Q2:
This functionality was already removed for backup/backup copy jobs in V11 if I remember correctly. There are no plans to bring it back. But we will add your feedback to the others. We got the request from time to time.
Best,
Fabian
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
- Novice
- Posts: 6
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 05, 2024 10:55 am
- Full Name: Mark
- Contact:
Re: V12 - Target specific VMs for copies
Thanks Fabian
Q2 isn't such a big issue, we can live without it it's more a nice to have. We've gone from V10 to V12, so it's possible it was removed in V11.
Q1 on the other hand is. If the situation is still the same in June when we review our software licensing we'll likely be looking to move to a different product purely because of that (I'm assuming copy from copy will be back by then, otherwise that would also be a factor).
Q2 isn't such a big issue, we can live without it it's more a nice to have. We've gone from V10 to V12, so it's possible it was removed in V11.
Q1 on the other hand is. If the situation is still the same in June when we review our software licensing we'll likely be looking to move to a different product purely because of that (I'm assuming copy from copy will be back by then, otherwise that would also be a factor).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], poolshark1 and 82 guests