Availability for the Always-On Enterprise
Post Reply
btmaus
Expert
Posts: 138
Liked: 10 times
Joined: Jul 17, 2015 9:02 am
Full Name: Glenn L
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by btmaus » Jan 17, 2017 8:42 pm

foggy wrote:Glenn, have you reviewed the recommendation given in the thread above?
Thanks for the reply foggy. So it looks like the below is what we will need to do when setting up a new 2016+ReFS repository?
tsightler wrote: have some temporary place to copy off all of their backups, reformat, recreate the repo so that it can be recognized as ReFS, copy all the backups back to new repo, rescan and remap existing backups.

v.Eremin
Veeam Software
Posts: 15157
Liked: 1141 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by v.Eremin » Jan 18, 2017 11:23 am

Correct.

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16841
Liked: 1361 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by foggy » Jan 18, 2017 11:25 am

Don't forget to perform full backup after that to enable new capabilities.

WRS2200
Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Aug 06, 2015 8:21 pm
Full Name: Weston Strom
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by WRS2200 » Jan 29, 2017 1:15 am

Thanks for the post. This was very helpful.

btmaus
Expert
Posts: 138
Liked: 10 times
Joined: Jul 17, 2015 9:02 am
Full Name: Glenn L
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by btmaus » Feb 01, 2017 12:39 am

I have a "best practce" question when adding a new 2016 ReFS Windows Repository to Veeam.

Which of these options should I enable when presented with the Storage Compatibility Settigs:

Align backup file data blocks
Decompress backup data blocks before storing
Use per-VM backup files

Thanks!

Gostev
Veeam Software
Posts: 23001
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by Gostev » Feb 01, 2017 9:33 pm

You will find that the first one is selected and disabled when you target ReFS volume, so you can't touch that one anyway ;)

As far as the other two - there is no sense to decompress when going to ReFS, and per-VM is not ReFS specific setting - so use general considerations there (per-VM will give you a better performance at the cost of some extra disk space consumption, and is always a good idea to have enabled beyond a few hundreds of VMs per job for scalability reasons).

tntteam
Enthusiast
Posts: 57
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Aug 28, 2015 12:40 pm
Full Name: tntteam
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by tntteam » Sep 11, 2017 9:46 am

Hi there,

That may already been asked, but I'm not able to find the information :(

Does refs delivers other advantages than full synthetics and data integrity ?

In my case, I'm using forever incremental, and I was wondering if I would gain any benefit, specially on "backup file merge" and "compact backup files" operations ?

Thanks

antipolis
Enthusiast
Posts: 68
Liked: 9 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2016 9:17 am
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by antipolis » Sep 11, 2017 9:53 am

you will benefit from refs on any transform operations, this includes file merge and compaction

tntteam
Enthusiast
Posts: 57
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Aug 28, 2015 12:40 pm
Full Name: tntteam
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by tntteam » Sep 11, 2017 12:00 pm

Thanks for info :)

Do I need to make an active full or anything to activate? I just created my refs repo, and I'm moving data from ntfs right now.
Once done, I'll change the backup specification's repository, and I should be good.

I'll report here any changes in the file merge execution time on the backup tonight.

antipolis
Enthusiast
Posts: 68
Liked: 9 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2016 9:17 am
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by antipolis » Sep 11, 2017 12:15 pm

you can either do an active full and your backup will be "block cloning aware" right away, or you can just activate weekly synthetics

did you make sure to format your refs volume(s) with 64k cluster size ?

tntteam
Enthusiast
Posts: 57
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Aug 28, 2015 12:40 pm
Full Name: tntteam
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by tntteam » Sep 11, 2017 12:43 pm

Yes!
Ok, that's not what I wished to hear, but I'll deal with it :)

antipolis
Enthusiast
Posts: 68
Liked: 9 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2016 9:17 am
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by antipolis » Sep 11, 2017 12:46 pm

actually I think if you wait till the next backup compaction it will do the job as well, but I'm not 100% on this, maybe someone else can confirm

FrancWest
Enthusiast
Posts: 35
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 17, 2017 3:20 am
Full Name: Franc
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by FrancWest » Jan 23, 2018 3:37 pm

All,

what about Microsoft's support statement that reFS is not supported on iSCSI luns? Anyone experienced issues with this?

See here:

ReFS is supported with Storage Spaces, Storage Spaces Direct, and non-removable direct attached drives. ReFS is not supported with hardware virtualized storage such as SANs or RAID controllers in non-passthrough mode. USB drives are also not supported.

source: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/window ... s-overview

Franc.

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16841
Liked: 1361 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by foggy » Jan 23, 2018 4:22 pm

It doesn't actually say iSCSI is not supported.

FrancWest
Enthusiast
Posts: 35
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 17, 2017 3:20 am
Full Name: Franc
Contact:

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Post by FrancWest » Jan 23, 2018 4:25 pm

Not? How do you read it then?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beerfluent, crmz81, Google [Bot] and 39 guests