Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
ratmo
Novice
Posts: 7 Liked: never
Joined: Aug 27, 2014 11:28 am
Full Name: Ryan Rutledge
Contact:
Post
by ratmo » Aug 27, 2014 11:49 am
this post
I would like to know what are the expected backups speeds one should expect on Full vs Incremental.
Currently my full run around 140MB or faster and my Incremental run about 25Mb
Should I Be expecting more on my Incremental?
Full Backup
Code: Select all
8/27/2014 1:33:11 PM :: Queued for processing at 8/27/2014 1:33:11 PM
8/27/2014 1:33:11 PM :: Required backup infrastructure resources have been assigned
8/27/2014 1:33:13 PM :: VM processing started at 8/27/2014 1:33:13 PM
8/27/2014 1:33:13 PM :: VM size: 60.0 GB (57.7 GB used)
8/27/2014 1:33:45 PM :: Indexing guest file system
8/27/2014 1:34:58 PM :: Inventoring guest system
8/27/2014 1:35:06 PM :: Creating VM snapshot
8/27/2014 1:35:16 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.vmx
8/27/2014 1:35:16 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.vmxf
8/27/2014 1:35:17 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.nvram
8/27/2014 1:35:18 PM :: Using backup proxy VMware Backup Proxy for disk Hard disk 1 [san]
8/27/2014 1:35:18 PM :: Hard disk 1 (40.0 GB) 29.1GB read at 149MB/s [CBT]
8/27/2014 1:38:58 PM :: Using backup proxy VMware Backup Proxy for disk Hard disk 2 [san]
8/27/2014 1:38:58 PM :: Hard disk 2 (20.0 GB) 3.1 GB read at 186MB/s [CBT]
8/27/2014 1:39:26 PM :: Saving GuestIndexData.zip
8/27/2014 1:39:27 PM :: Publishing guest file system index to catalog
8/27/2014 1:39:28 PM :: Finalizing
Incremental Backup
Code: Select all
8/27/2014 1:41:40 PM :: Queued for processing at 8/27/2014 1:41:40 PM
8/27/2014 1:41:40 PM :: Required backup infrastructure resources have been assigned
8/27/2014 1:41:43 PM :: VM processing started at 8/27/2014 1:41:43 PM
8/27/2014 1:41:43 PM :: VM size: 60.0 GB (57.7 GB used)
8/27/2014 1:42:01 PM :: Indexing guest file system
8/27/2014 1:43:10 PM :: Inventoring guest system
8/27/2014 1:43:22 PM :: Creating VM snapshot
8/27/2014 1:43:32 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.vmx
8/27/2014 1:43:32 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.vmxf
8/27/2014 1:43:33 PM :: Saving [VM-Data-Store-1-SAS-EQL] SIM-PRINT-NT01/SIM-PRINT-NT01.nvram
8/27/2014 1:43:34 PM :: Using backup proxy VMware Backup Proxy for disk Hard disk 1 [san]
8/27/2014 1:43:34 PM :: Hard disk 1 (40.0 GB)219MB read at 44MB/s [CBT]
8/27/2014 1:43:51 PM :: Using backup proxy VMware Backup Proxy for disk Hard disk 2 [san]
8/27/2014 1:43:51 PM :: Hard disk 2 (20.0 GB) 102MB read at 48MB/s [CBT]
8/27/2014 1:44:02 PM :: Saving GuestIndexData.zip
8/27/2014 1:44:04 PM :: Publishing guest file system index to catalog
8/27/2014 1:44:04 PM :: Finalizing
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14726 Liked: 1707 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:
Post
by Dima P. » Aug 27, 2014 1:00 pm
this post
Hello Ryan,
Could you, please, elaborate on your backup infrastructure configuration: is Veeam B&R physical server or VM, what type storage you are using, and how they are both connected? Additionally, I wonder what shows the bottleneck analysis for both cases. Thank you.
ratmo
Novice
Posts: 7 Liked: never
Joined: Aug 27, 2014 11:28 am
Full Name: Ryan Rutledge
Contact:
Post
by ratmo » Aug 27, 2014 1:20 pm
this post
Veeam is running on a physical server 2 CPU 4 core Xoen 32Gb Ram when backups run there is very little performance hit on the server. Storage that vmware is running on is equallogic's I have it running with direct SAN access.
The Veeam Server has 2x 10Gbic nics connecting to the storage with Jumbo frames setup.
Full Backup
8/27/2014 1:53:25 PM :: Load: Source 94% > Proxy 79% > Network 0% > Target 0%
Incremental
8/27/2014 1:53:25 PM :: Load: Source 94% > Proxy 79% > Network 0% > Target 0%
Oh and thanks for any assistance you can give
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21139 Liked: 2141 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:
Post
by foggy » Aug 27, 2014 2:07 pm
this post
Ryan, are you sure you're posting the correct stats? The numbers are entirely equal, including dates...
Shestakov
Veteran
Posts: 7328 Liked: 781 times
Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
Location: Prague
Contact:
Post
by Shestakov » Aug 27, 2014 2:10 pm
this post
Hello Ryan,
Ryan wrote: Currently my full run around 140MB or faster and my Incremental run about 25Mb
Should I Be expecting more on my Incremental?
Did you mean 140 MByte/sec for Full backup and 25 Mbit/sec for Incremental backup?
What type of incremental backup do you use?
Thank you.
ratmo
Novice
Posts: 7 Liked: never
Joined: Aug 27, 2014 11:28 am
Full Name: Ryan Rutledge
Contact:
Post
by ratmo » Aug 27, 2014 2:16 pm
this post
My bad the incremental one was not right and its a reverse incremental
8/27/2014 1:44:55 PM :: Load: Source 99% > Proxy 28% > Network 0% > Target 0%
ratmo
Novice
Posts: 7 Liked: never
Joined: Aug 27, 2014 11:28 am
Full Name: Ryan Rutledge
Contact:
Post
by ratmo » Aug 27, 2014 2:19 pm
this post
nshestakov wrote: Hello Ryan,
Did you mean 140 MByte/sec for Full backup and 25 Mbit/sec for Incremental backup?
140 MByte/sec and 25 MByte/sec for clarity
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14726 Liked: 1707 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:
Post
by Dima P. » Aug 28, 2014 2:33 pm
this post
Ryan,
Could we ask you to perform the following test – please, switch the proxy transport mode to network, run backup one more time and provide us with the bottleneck output and backup session log? Thank you.
Users browsing this forum: Regnor and 85 guests