Veeam vs Unitrends

[zak2011]

I happened to get a mail from Unitrends comparing Veeam vs Unitrends and highligting the cons and just one advantage of Veeam.
http://www.unitrends.com/resources/comp ... ise-backup

Honestly, it was quite strange and funny to read the so called disadvantages of Veeam, according to Unitrends which seemed to be published without a proper grounding.
For example..one of the points was 'Single point of failure for Veeam's backup repository. Does not back up Veeam server'.
I dont understand how this can be a disadvantage, when one follows the best practices stated out in the forums.
Another point is about data encryption. First its mentioned Veeam does not support encryption and then it states in another point, veeam supports encryption but only data in flight and not for data in rest
After going thru all the list of so called disadvantages of Veeam, it seems to me that Unitrends may need to do much more homework before putting up product comparisons.

[Gostev]

Always funny to see how a 25 years old company with 4'000 customers is trying to convince us they have a better solution than 5 year old company with 75'000 customers (and on track to over 90'000 by the end of this year)

[lethallynx]

I particularity love the line

The non-integrated nature of Veeam leads to finger-pointing among the server, storage, networks, operating systems, and data protection (backup, archiving, and disaster recovery) software vendors when a problem occurs.

Maybe that's because this is usually where the problem usually lies?

How can they call Veeam non-integrated? Doesn't get much more integrated than using the vSphere API .....