Hi,
I'm having trouble identifying the bottleneck on a backup copy job using WAN accelerators. I've read Target WAN is Disk IO on the target WAN accelerator cache - which is an all flash array LUN, but it's showing very little signs of use.
https://imgur.com/F79bs3S
https://imgur.com/a/rxXwohp
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 15
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Aug 29, 2016 10:54 pm
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14836
- Liked: 3083 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: WAN Accelerator Bottleneck
Hello,
from my point of view, you don't need to troubleshoot anything. The values are not higher than 90%. I recommend not starting any investigations as long there is not one value permanently between 95 and 99%
Best regards,
Hannes
from my point of view, you don't need to troubleshoot anything. The values are not higher than 90%. I recommend not starting any investigations as long there is not one value permanently between 95 and 99%
Best regards,
Hannes
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 15
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Aug 29, 2016 10:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: WAN Accelerator Bottleneck
Thanks Hannes, that's good to know.
Are there any ways to improve the performance of the job? i've tried changing streams on the WAN accelerator upto 50 but it's still using a fraction of the WAN link.
Are there any ways to improve the performance of the job? i've tried changing streams on the WAN accelerator upto 50 but it's still using a fraction of the WAN link.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14836
- Liked: 3083 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: WAN Accelerator Bottleneck
what bandwidth do you have and which version of VBR are you using?
With V10, there is a new "high bandwidth" mode... with 9.5 you will be limited around 50-100MBit/s. Streams only help with high latency. Otherwise they might even make it slower.
With V10, there is a new "high bandwidth" mode... with 9.5 you will be limited around 50-100MBit/s. Streams only help with high latency. Otherwise they might even make it slower.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Ivan239, Semrush [Bot] and 121 guests