Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
karsten123
Service Provider
Posts: 338
Liked: 78 times
Joined: Apr 03, 2019 6:53 am
Full Name: Karsten Meja
Contact:

WAN accelerator question

Post by karsten123 »

Hi,

we have several wan accelerators and at processing hard disk it stays for big disks like 4-5TB over an hour with no progress in job log.

What is going on at this stage and what side have to do the heavy lifting? Is it source or target?

The most time the bottleneck is target wan.

thanks guys
karsten123
Service Provider
Posts: 338
Liked: 78 times
Joined: Apr 03, 2019 6:53 am
Full Name: Karsten Meja
Contact:

Re: WAN accelerator question

Post by karsten123 »

Maybe it is because source job uses compression high?
karsten123
Service Provider
Posts: 338
Liked: 78 times
Joined: Apr 03, 2019 6:53 am
Full Name: Karsten Meja
Contact:

Re: WAN accelerator question

Post by karsten123 »

nobody?
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31347
Liked: 6597 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: WAN accelerator question

Post by Gostev »

Hi, Karsten.

Most heavy lifting is done by the source WAN accelerator as it's the one doing the chunking/dedupe.

I can't imaging decompression being an issue as it is fairly light on CPU (unlike compression).

Please remember to direct any environment-specific issues to technical support, as we ask when you click New Topic. They will be able to tell from the debug logs if there's an issue or if everything is working normally. When it comes to possible environmental issues, this is a much better strategy than pinging us PMs here on the forums ;)

Thanks!
karsten123
Service Provider
Posts: 338
Liked: 78 times
Joined: Apr 03, 2019 6:53 am
Full Name: Karsten Meja
Contact:

Re: WAN accelerator question

Post by karsten123 »

understood.
Thank you Anton
karsten123
Service Provider
Posts: 338
Liked: 78 times
Joined: Apr 03, 2019 6:53 am
Full Name: Karsten Meja
Contact:

Re: WAN accelerator question

Post by karsten123 »

I did open a support case: 05867090
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 24 guests