Hello,
I'm thinking about downgrading to Enterprise from Enterprise Plus and about the only missing feature that will impact me is losing WAN Acceleration.
Looking at last night's numbers for one of my backup copy jobs, it appears I transferred just 4.4 GB thanks to WAN Acceleration. Which of the following numbers represents what I would have needed to transfer without WAN Acceleration?
Processed: 93.4 GB
Read: 126.0 GB
Backup size: 22.8 GB
-
- Expert
- Posts: 231
- Liked: 18 times
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009 5:09 pm
- Full Name: Chris
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14726
- Liked: 1706 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans
Hi,
The estimate is close to the represented backup size.
The estimate is close to the represented backup size.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 231
- Liked: 18 times
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009 5:09 pm
- Full Name: Chris
- Contact:
Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans
Thank you, Dima. In that case, downgrading to Enterprise will not be a problem for me.
-- Chris
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14726
- Liked: 1706 times
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Full Name: Dmitry Popov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans
Chris,
Keep thinking about a fair testing for your environment setup. For instance, you could set up a new backup copy job without WAN acceleration being enabled and check the resulting ‘Transferred’ counter for this job.
Keep thinking about a fair testing for your environment setup. For instance, you could set up a new backup copy job without WAN acceleration being enabled and check the resulting ‘Transferred’ counter for this job.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 76 guests