Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
cparker4486
Expert
Posts: 231
Liked: 18 times
Joined: Dec 07, 2009 5:09 pm
Full Name: Chris
Contact:

Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to transfer?

Post by cparker4486 » Sep 28, 2016 3:47 pm

Hello,

I'm thinking about downgrading to Enterprise from Enterprise Plus and about the only missing feature that will impact me is losing WAN Acceleration.

Looking at last night's numbers for one of my backup copy jobs, it appears I transferred just 4.4 GB thanks to WAN Acceleration. Which of the following numbers represents what I would have needed to transfer without WAN Acceleration?

Processed: 93.4 GB
Read: 126.0 GB
Backup size: 22.8 GB
-- Chris

Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 10537
Liked: 858 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans

Post by Dima P. » Sep 28, 2016 3:54 pm

Hi,

The estimate is close to the represented backup size.

cparker4486
Expert
Posts: 231
Liked: 18 times
Joined: Dec 07, 2009 5:09 pm
Full Name: Chris
Contact:

Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans

Post by cparker4486 » Sep 28, 2016 4:04 pm

Thank you, Dima. In that case, downgrading to Enterprise will not be a problem for me.
-- Chris

Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 10537
Liked: 858 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Without WAN Acceleration, how much would I need to trans

Post by Dima P. » Sep 28, 2016 4:42 pm

Chris,

Keep thinking about a fair testing for your environment setup. For instance, you could set up a new backup copy job without WAN acceleration being enabled and check the resulting ‘Transferred’ counter for this job.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 25 guests