-
- Influencer
- Posts: 16
- Liked: 47 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2024 8:36 am
- Full Name: Olivier Lambert
- Contact:
XCP-ng support
Hi everyone!
Due to the raising demand from our VMware users migrating to XCP-ng, I thought it could be useful to create a thread here.
I'm Olivier, CEO and co-founder of Vates (https://vates.tech), the company behind both XCP-ng and Xen Orchestra (XO). Despite XO already does VM backups, I'm completely fine to grow the ecosystem to add features we won't do anyway (like application aware backup for example). You can already use VEEAM agent in your VM to do it, but people are asking for even more integration.
Unlike for some other platforms, and as the editor of the whole stack, I'm ready to provide some internal resources so the VEEAM team could catch up pretty fast, since all the APIs already exists. We have 10 years of knowledge consuming XCP-ng API, so this could be really worthwhile for VEEAM to quickly get a working solution.
Let me know what can be done to make things moving forward
Bonus points: if you do the VEEAM integration for XCP-ng API, you will also automatically have it for XenServer, since we use the same API. 2 birds one stone!
edit: as a proof of our commitment to help you, I already added VEEAM as a compatible solution with agents in our official XCP-ng doc: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/project/ecosystem/#veeam
Due to the raising demand from our VMware users migrating to XCP-ng, I thought it could be useful to create a thread here.
I'm Olivier, CEO and co-founder of Vates (https://vates.tech), the company behind both XCP-ng and Xen Orchestra (XO). Despite XO already does VM backups, I'm completely fine to grow the ecosystem to add features we won't do anyway (like application aware backup for example). You can already use VEEAM agent in your VM to do it, but people are asking for even more integration.
Unlike for some other platforms, and as the editor of the whole stack, I'm ready to provide some internal resources so the VEEAM team could catch up pretty fast, since all the APIs already exists. We have 10 years of knowledge consuming XCP-ng API, so this could be really worthwhile for VEEAM to quickly get a working solution.
Let me know what can be done to make things moving forward
Bonus points: if you do the VEEAM integration for XCP-ng API, you will also automatically have it for XenServer, since we use the same API. 2 birds one stone!
edit: as a proof of our commitment to help you, I already added VEEAM as a compatible solution with agents in our official XCP-ng doc: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/project/ecosystem/#veeam
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31749
- Liked: 7252 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Hi, Olivier. Thank you for registering and your kind offer. At the moment we don't have R&D resources available to work on XCP-ng integration for host-level backups. We will contact you should this change in future. Meanwhile you're right, agent-based backup is the way to go. Best regards!
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 16
- Liked: 47 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2024 8:36 am
- Full Name: Olivier Lambert
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Thanks Gostev! And no problem
Let me know anytime if you need an overview on the current API to speed up things
Let me know anytime if you need an overview on the current API to speed up things
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 25
- Liked: 10 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Full Name: David M
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
As a long time Veeam user (since 2010!) i would LOVE XCP-NG/XenServer support to be added to Veeam. Broadcom came along and killed all Edu/Academic discounts and shot our renewal price up 8X this year, and as a result we are in the process of moving to XCP-NG/XenOrchestra. The built in backup/replication is decent but if Veeam support was there we would definitely continue paying for and using Veeam!
-
- Expert
- Posts: 115
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Sep 05, 2016 5:08 am
- Full Name: Nathan Oldfield
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I’ve spun up xcp-ng and liking it so far. We will be moving our workloads that are backed up by Veeam to hyperV but will move other workloads to xcp
Coming from VMware I found it pretty easy to get going after watching a few videos from Tom Lawrence
Agent based backups have a few limitations when it comes to restoring iirc so not something I’m considering at this point.
Not an issue for me yet, but hopefully the 2TB vhd limit is in the pipeline to be addressed.
Coming from VMware I found it pretty easy to get going after watching a few videos from Tom Lawrence
Agent based backups have a few limitations when it comes to restoring iirc so not something I’m considering at this point.
Not an issue for me yet, but hopefully the 2TB vhd limit is in the pipeline to be addressed.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31749
- Liked: 7252 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Could you clarify what few limitations are you referring to?
VHD is way too old to change now. Why not just use VHDX, these can go up to 64TB.
VHD is way too old to change now. Why not just use VHDX, these can go up to 64TB.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 115
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Sep 05, 2016 5:08 am
- Full Name: Nathan Oldfield
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Sorry. For some reason I was thinking there were issue restoring agent backups to other hypervisors but I am mistaken.
But still the issue of the agent needing direct access to the repo iirc whereas the VMware type backup can be separate.
I’m aware the 2TB limit is due to the use of VHD, not sure why they have not gone to vhdx yet. Would be good.
I understand why it’s unlikely to be on the Veeam radar being xen based when others are KVM which you already support.
But still the issue of the agent needing direct access to the repo iirc whereas the VMware type backup can be separate.
I’m aware the 2TB limit is due to the use of VHD, not sure why they have not gone to vhdx yet. Would be good.
I understand why it’s unlikely to be on the Veeam radar being xen based when others are KVM which you already support.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Mar 31, 2024 4:51 pm
- Full Name: hoef je niet te weten
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
i would like to see this implementation for our workloads with Xen
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jul 07, 2015 12:05 am
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Same here.
i would like to see this new feature.
i would like to see this new feature.
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 556
- Liked: 103 times
- Joined: Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
- Full Name: Marco Novelli
- Location: Asti - Italy
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Hi Gostev, instead of working on Enterprise Features to milk Enterprise Customers with Enterprise Licenses I suggest to Veeam to look around to support as many Hypervisors as possible... you are leaving money on the table from SMB CustomersGostev wrote: ↑Mar 25, 2024 10:08 am Hi, Olivier. Thank you for registering and your kind offer. At the moment we don't have R&D resources available to work on XCP-ng integration for host-level backups. We will contact you should this change in future. Meanwhile you're right, agent-based backup is the way to go. Best regards!
Today's world is dominated by Enterprise Customers but the future... I predict (hope) a collapse of those big pachyderms
Marco
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 59
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Jan 08, 2013 4:26 pm
- Full Name: Falk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I think Xen as Hypervisor has no Future. All Big Player, include SUSE have change to KVM.
With the build in Feature to migrate ESXi VMs to Proxmox, makes very easy to go KVM based virtualization.
With the build in Feature to migrate ESXi VMs to Proxmox, makes very easy to go KVM based virtualization.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 11
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: Jul 10, 2018 6:20 pm
- Full Name: Jason
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I would like to put a feature request behind this as well.
Been using the Veeam agent on my XenServer environment and works OK but full backup support would be really bloody wonderful.
PS.. maybe just me but with Veeam Agent restores, i can only get it to restore over the network at 100Mbit. I messed around with some nic drivers but never been able to get it working faster then 100Mbit which kind of sks.
Been using the Veeam agent on my XenServer environment and works OK but full backup support would be really bloody wonderful.
PS.. maybe just me but with Veeam Agent restores, i can only get it to restore over the network at 100Mbit. I messed around with some nic drivers but never been able to get it working faster then 100Mbit which kind of sks.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: 8 times
- Joined: Jul 19, 2021 5:09 pm
- Full Name: Joshua
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I would also like to see this integration. If I recall correctly regarding KVM, it's not just the hypervisor that matters, but the control plane which makes it not a one size fits all solution for all KVM. With XCP-NG and using the API, due to its architecture, it would benefit both Citrix Xen and XCP-NG. There are still some areas I'd love to see Xen make more progress, but there are also areas that I'm personally not fully ready to deploy KVM. Just my $.02.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31749
- Liked: 7252 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Hi Joshua, what about oVirt for the KVM control plane? One of our large customers (big brand) has RHV infrastructure of a few thousand VMs. That is in additions to their main vSphere farm which is many times bigger, of course. But it works well for them... well, worked well - until Red Hat decided to discontinue RHV.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: May 25, 2022 12:37 am
- Full Name: Jake
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I disagree that Xen has no future, also there is a migration tool/feature in XCP-NG to migrate from VMWare already in place (and worked incredibly well in my homelab migration).SkyDiver79 wrote: ↑Apr 01, 2024 11:38 am I think Xen as Hypervisor has no Future. All Big Player, include SUSE have change to KVM.
With the build in Feature to migrate ESXi VMs to Proxmox, makes very easy to go KVM based virtualization.
I would also love to see XCP-NG support at the hypervisor level instead of agents, so put me down for another feature request.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 21
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Aug 14, 2022 7:20 am
- Full Name: Peter Neumann
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Well they are also busy with delivering a non Windows based Veeam Backup Server, a web based console instead of the installable one, hopefully in this decade. I see XCP-ng as an option - a really good one - for SMB-s who are not on expert level in everything just to run Proxmox, instead of their current VMware.m.novelli wrote: ↑Apr 01, 2024 8:38 am Hi Gostev, instead of working on Enterprise Features to milk Enterprise Customers with Enterprise Licenses I suggest to Veeam to look around to support as many Hypervisors as possible... you are leaving money on the table from SMB Customers
Today's world is dominated by Enterprise Customers but the future... I predict (hope) a collapse of those big pachyderms
Marco
VCIX DCV,VCIX NV,HCI Master,Tanzu Specialist,vExpert/PRO/NSX,VMCE
-
- Novice
- Posts: 8
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: May 02, 2016 9:59 am
- Full Name: Ralf Luithle
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I do not see a real benefit using XCP-ng with Support....
https://vates.tech/pricing-and-support/
It's expensive too....
https://vates.tech/pricing-and-support/
It's expensive too....
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 59
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Jan 08, 2013 4:26 pm
- Full Name: Falk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
With Proxmox, the GUI is much more similar to that of vSphere and the changeover is easier for the admins.newman wrote: ↑Apr 02, 2024 4:38 am Well they are also busy with delivering a non Windows based Veeam Backup Server, a web based console instead of the installable one, hopefully in this decade. I see XCP-ng as an option - a really good one - for SMB-s who are not on expert level in everything just to run Proxmox, instead of their current VMware.
What also deters many SMBs is the limitation to 2TB per vDisk or you lose an extremely important feature, incremental backups.
I have already shown some customers the options:
Hyper-V, XCP-ng and Proxmox.
Few customers opt for HyperV, if they do, it's because they want to be able to continue using Veeam in full.
All the others have opted for Proxmox just because of the GUI, as it is much easier to get used to.
One point in favor of Proxmox is with German authorities, also the German support.
Veeam will not be able to support every hypervisor, so my opinion is that XCP-ng will not find the necessary distribution to make it interesting for Veeam.
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 59
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Jan 08, 2013 4:26 pm
- Full Name: Falk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Do you mean the Conversion Manager?
https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xenser ... nager.html
The thing has extreme limitations. vDisks under 2TB, a maximum of 3 vDisks per VM and only a very limited number of guest OS are supported.
Live migration from ESXi to Proxmox without such limitations is simply better.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 42
- Liked: 32 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2017 11:51 am
- Full Name: William
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I find it honorable that XCP-ng writes such a commitment. There are many Hyper-Visor vendors that do not consider this necessary (unfortunately).
+1 for the feature request.
+1 for the feature request.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 15
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Jan 17, 2014 10:25 am
- Full Name: jeremy
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
+1 for XCP-ng
It's a real alternative with XEN technology, and great features, I tried it because we are leaving from hyper-v, unfortunately not integrate with Veeam at host level. So It's a no go in our company...
It's a real alternative with XEN technology, and great features, I tried it because we are leaving from hyper-v, unfortunately not integrate with Veeam at host level. So It's a no go in our company...
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31749
- Liked: 7252 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
While completely unrelated to XCP-ng, reposting here merely for awareness:
Support for host-level backup of Oracle Linux KVM hypervisor is now generally available.
Download the plug-in now > Veeam Backup for Oracle Linux KVM
Datasheet from Oracle > Oracle Linux KVM and Virtualization Manager
Our dedicated subforum for oVirt KVM based hypervisors (RHV and OLKVM) > oVirt KVM
Please post any OLKVM-related questions there and the responsible PM will answer.
Support for host-level backup of Oracle Linux KVM hypervisor is now generally available.
Download the plug-in now > Veeam Backup for Oracle Linux KVM
Datasheet from Oracle > Oracle Linux KVM and Virtualization Manager
Our dedicated subforum for oVirt KVM based hypervisors (RHV and OLKVM) > oVirt KVM
Please post any OLKVM-related questions there and the responsible PM will answer.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 25
- Liked: 10 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Full Name: David M
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I agree the 2TB limitation does need to be overcome sooner rather than later. I hope Vates has this as a top priority along with their new UI in Xen Orchestra 6. However XCP-NG DOES support incremental backups already. https://docs.xcp-ng.org/management/backup/SkyDiver79 wrote: ↑Apr 02, 2024 6:39 am With Proxmox, the GUI is much more similar to that of vSphere and the changeover is easier for the admins.
What also deters many SMBs is the limitation to 2TB per vDisk or you lose an extremely important feature, incremental backups.
I have already shown some customers the options:
Hyper-V, XCP-ng and Proxmox.
Few customers opt for HyperV, if they do, it's because they want to be able to continue using Veeam in full.
All the others have opted for Proxmox just because of the GUI, as it is much easier to get used to.
One point in favor of Proxmox is with German authorities, also the German support.
Veeam will not be able to support every hypervisor, so my opinion is that XCP-ng will not find the necessary distribution to make it interesting for Veeam.
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 59
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Jan 08, 2013 4:26 pm
- Full Name: Falk
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Yes, up to 2TB vDisks. Bigger vDisks only Full Backupsy
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 16
- Liked: 47 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2024 8:36 am
- Full Name: Olivier Lambert
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
I never understand why -on a regular basis- some Proxmox fans are always trying to undermine XCP-ng. This doesn't give a great opinion on the Proxmox community…SkyDiver79 wrote: ↑Apr 02, 2024 6:39 am With Proxmox, the GUI is much more similar to that of vSphere and the changeover is easier for the admins.
What also deters many SMBs is the limitation to 2TB per vDisk or you lose an extremely important feature, incremental backups.
I have already shown some customers the options:
Hyper-V, XCP-ng and Proxmox.
Few customers opt for HyperV, if they do, it's because they want to be able to continue using Veeam in full.
All the others have opted for Proxmox just because of the GUI, as it is much easier to get used to.
One point in favor of Proxmox is with German authorities, also the German support.
Veeam will not be able to support every hypervisor, so my opinion is that XCP-ng will not find the necessary distribution to make it interesting for Veeam.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 16
- Liked: 47 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2024 8:36 am
- Full Name: Olivier Lambert
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
About SMAPIv3 and removing the 2TiB limitation: keep an eye open for a blog post next week
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 16
- Liked: 47 times
- Joined: Jan 22, 2024 8:36 am
- Full Name: Olivier Lambert
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
No, a dedicated integrated tool in Xen Orchestra, called V2V. There's an UI, it's connecting to the ESXi host, and list the VMs. You select all VMs you want to migrate and that's it (yes you can do many VMs at once).
It's even supporting warm migration from VMware to XCP-ng (using the incremental export from VMware). It exists since more than 1y, far before Proxmox did their tool. That's how we convert 99% of our new customers coming from VMware.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Apr 06, 2024 12:16 pm
- Full Name: Marc Lachapelle
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Some of my customers are using Veeam B&R o Hyper-V and it is perfect. I'd like to see the agentless version on XCP-ng. XCP-ng is a serious alternative to VMWare and XCP-ng being open source supporting it would allow many universities, homelabbers, etc. to train on you rtool otherwise than in production. I work in cybersecurity and we need better train everybody on backup best practices. If people train on your tool you can bet they will deploy your tool in production
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 47
- Liked: 12 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2020 3:17 pm
- Full Name: Mercurio
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
+1 for xcp-ng
I think many customers are shifting their focus to viable alternatives to VMware and it would be great to fully utilize its agentless features.
I think many customers are shifting their focus to viable alternatives to VMware and it would be great to fully utilize its agentless features.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: 8 times
- Joined: Jul 19, 2021 5:09 pm
- Full Name: Joshua
- Contact:
Re: XCP-ng support
Hi Gostev,Gostev wrote: ↑Apr 01, 2024 6:19 pm Hi Joshua, what about oVirt for the KVM control plane? One of our large customers (big brand) has RHV infrastructure of a few thousand VMs. That is in additions to their main vSphere farm which is many times bigger, of course. But it works well for them... well, worked well - until Red Hat decided to discontinue RHV.
oVirt is still Red Hat (and derivative) centric even with the deprecation of RHV. Although there are efforts to bring it to Debian, it still seems like it has a little way to go (unless my information is outdated). But this actually illustrates my point. KVM is available with any Linux distribution (Red Hat, Debian, Suse, Oracle, Ubuntu, etc.), but Veeam cannot be made compatible with KVM, it must be made compatible with whatever KVM control plane is used. oVirt could get there, but it's not there yet, and it isn't the only KVM control plane. It is a different architecture from Xen where building something for XCP-NG will also benefit Citrix Xen. Just my $.02.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DonZoomik, iDeNt_5, Mildur, Semrush [Bot] and 93 guests