Hello,
When I do a report for instance for an datastore I see that the monitor data is more explicit than the reporter data.
Even when we talk about the same period for instance one week.
I see in my report max data store read latency 3ms while in my monitor for the same period I see a max datastore read latency of 7ms.
Is it possible to get more details in those reports?
kind regards,
Ivor
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 62
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 03, 2011 2:55 pm
- Full Name: Ivor Dillen
- Contact:
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27377
- Liked: 2799 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: monitor vs reporter: other numbers
Hi Ivor,
Our reports are using 2 hours data stamps for displaying performance data (as opposed to Monitor Client which uses 5 minutes intervals for the past week), so this deviation is expected. If your datastore latency had been on the same level for a longer period, you would have seen the same graphs in both views.
In our next version we will give you an ability to build performance reports based on raw data by exporting all available performance data points into Excel workbook, this should allow you to build the report with any level of granularity.
Thanks!
Our reports are using 2 hours data stamps for displaying performance data (as opposed to Monitor Client which uses 5 minutes intervals for the past week), so this deviation is expected. If your datastore latency had been on the same level for a longer period, you would have seen the same graphs in both views.
In our next version we will give you an ability to build performance reports based on raw data by exporting all available performance data points into Excel workbook, this should allow you to build the report with any level of granularity.
Thanks!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 62
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 03, 2011 2:55 pm
- Full Name: Ivor Dillen
- Contact:
Re: monitor vs reporter: other numbers
Nice thanks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests