Direct Restore to Microsoft Azure | VeeamPN software-defined networking
Post Reply
kennyb
Service Provider
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Apr 05, 2017 9:34 pm
Full Name: Ken Barhite
Contact:

Headstart restore feature request

Post by kennyb » May 01, 2017 10:18 pm

The Restore to Azure VM feature is great! But it could be better :) with the addition of an enhancement that I'll call "Headstart restore" (stealing from a similar feature in StorageCraft). This would be a recurring job that keeps VHDs in Azure in sync with the latest incremental backups. Then when we need complete the restore, it would simply do one more check for new incremental backups to inject into the VHD and then it would launch the VM. This could greatly reduce the time it takes to recover in Azure because most if not all of the bits are already laid down. With this feature we could potentially eliminate the need for Azure Site Recovery (or Zerto) and have one integrated backup/DR solution that meets a 1 hour RTO.

Along with that, let us pre-stage settings like Network Security Groups (many would say it's not a good security practice to assume RDP/3389 should open).

veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 16514
Liked: 1373 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Headstart restore feature request

Post by veremin » May 04, 2017 1:09 pm

1. Sounds more like a replication to me. Our Hyper-V replication used to have similar mechanism - the latest point was a fully functional VM, previous restore points were kept in form of reversed incremental backups.
2. This requirement has been tracked already.

kennyb
Service Provider
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Apr 05, 2017 9:34 pm
Full Name: Ken Barhite
Contact:

Re: Headstart restore feature request

Post by kennyb » May 05, 2017 9:24 pm

Hi, what I'm suggesting not quite the same as Replication - although I think it would be great to also have Azure as a replication target. Many of our clients are in rural areas with limited bandwidth. I want to get backups copied offsite but often won't have enough bandwidth to do both replication of VMs and copy backups to Azure. The advantage to what I'm suggesting is that you're only sending the bits to Azure once, not twice. We work with other backup solutions that provide backup and DR using this concept (StorageCraft, Datto, Continuum, etc.). They just don't use Azure as the destination which is unfortunate and why we're jumping into Veeam.

veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 16514
Liked: 1373 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Headstart restore feature request

Post by veremin » May 08, 2017 1:41 pm 1 person likes this post

As soon as we have a replication to Azure, your scenario will be automatically covered, because we already can replicate VMs, using either production host or backup as the data source. So the second option (replication from backup) will come quite handy - tenants with limited bandwidth will send data to Azure only once.

Thanks.

jayscarff
Service Provider
Posts: 90
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Nov 15, 2016 6:56 pm
Location: Cayman Islands
Contact:

Re: Headstart restore feature request

Post by jayscarff » Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Any news on when this might be available ?
Jason
VMCE v9

veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 16514
Liked: 1373 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Headstart restore feature request

Post by veremin » Sep 20, 2018 9:25 am

There are no short-term plans. Thanks!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests