It is now at 70 GB of 100 GB disc and the counter says -1:-32:22 in the duration column.
Everything looks okey and working.
The Veeam software is running in a virtual XP machine with 4 GB RAM and 2 vCPU.
Regards
Anders
-
andnym
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jul 13, 2011 8:04 am
- Full Name: Anders Nyman
- Contact:
A flaw?
During a replication I want ed to try in a temporary environment I noticed that when the replication procedure got about half way into the third virtual disc of the VM the duration counter started to count backwards.
It is now at 70 GB of 100 GB disc and the counter says -1:-32:22 in the duration column.
Everything looks okey and working.
The Veeam software is running in a virtual XP machine with 4 GB RAM and 2 vCPU.
Regards
Anders
It is now at 70 GB of 100 GB disc and the counter says -1:-32:22 in the duration column.
Everything looks okey and working.
The Veeam software is running in a virtual XP machine with 4 GB RAM and 2 vCPU.
Regards
Anders
-
Gostev
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31806
- Liked: 7300 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: A flaw?
Could be due to a time difference between some computers involved into this job (backup server, proxy, etc.)?
-
andnym
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: Jul 13, 2011 8:04 am
- Full Name: Anders Nyman
- Contact:
Re: A flaw?
As far as I can tell all server involved has the same time set. But anyway the replication worked without any problem
-
foggy
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: A flaw?
Anders, all occurrences of the duration counter counting backwards we've observed here were caused by mistiming. I think it would be best to involve our support if you want to investigate this deeper.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], david.tosoff and 65 guests