-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jan 07, 2015 9:14 pm
- Contact:
B&R from Dell Equallogic
Hello All,
I am trying to look into direct san access for my B&R setup. We are running the most current version of the server and proxies.
The question is, does anyone have a guide of what needs to be done for the proxy to interface with the Dell Equallogic? Also does it require the proxy to be a physical machine?
I assume direct san backups are faster vs using vSphere, but if anyone has any insight, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Chris
I am trying to look into direct san access for my B&R setup. We are running the most current version of the server and proxies.
The question is, does anyone have a guide of what needs to be done for the proxy to interface with the Dell Equallogic? Also does it require the proxy to be a physical machine?
I assume direct san backups are faster vs using vSphere, but if anyone has any insight, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Chris
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
Chris, please review the corresponding FAQ section, also there are a lot of existing topics regarding that, so you can use search to find those discussing your storage specifically.cdfosburg wrote:The question is, does anyone have a guide of what needs to be done for the proxy to interface with the Dell Equallogic?
Depending on the connection, it can be either physical or virtual. However, virtual proxy doesn't make much sense in this case.cdfosburg wrote:Also does it require the proxy to be a physical machine?
Typically, direct SAN backups are faster than using hotadd, however it always depends on the particular setup.cdfosburg wrote:I assume direct san backups are faster vs using vSphere, but if anyone has any insight, I would appreciate it.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jan 07, 2015 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
So it can be virtual, however the recommended is to have it be physical and connected directly into the SAN switches?Depending on the connection, it can be either physical or virtual. However, virtual proxy doesn't make much sense in this case.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
Correct.
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jan 07, 2015 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
Ok, So I finally have the equipment to do this. I "think" I setup the HIT correctly for my Equallogic. however, how can I tell this is working?
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 22
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jan 07, 2015 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
I tried to edit my post, but could not. So, I have confirmed with Dell that I am connected to my Equallogic and can see all the iSCSI connections. I checked on my Server 2012 R2 and I also can see all the connections under the Microsoft iSCSI connector. Now, I tried to follow the article http://www.jpaul.me/2010/08/the-mission ... n-backups/, but it is a bit out of date when it comes to 2012R2.
So, if I am authenticated to my SAN and I start the connection to the lun via iSCSI, why is my backup still failing?
So, if I am authenticated to my SAN and I start the connection to the lun via iSCSI, why is my backup still failing?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: B&R from Dell Equallogic
Do you see VMFS volumes in the Windows Disk Management snap-in? What is the reason of the job failure?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bct44, Jordi.B, shangwsh and 63 guests