Hello,
Does it matter for a COPY BACKUP what the source backup job is (a incremental / reversed incremental job) or not ?
If yes, is there a Best Practice ?
Regards
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 14
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: May 14, 2013 11:28 am
- Full Name: Eddy Mandemaker
- Contact:
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: COPY Backup - Source job importance?
Hello Eddy,
Backup copy jobs support both forward(including forever incremental) and reversed incremental as a source.
However seeding is possible for forward incremental backup chains only.
Could you explain your use case? Have you considered using Forever Forward Incremental Backup method?
Thanks!
Backup copy jobs support both forward(including forever incremental) and reversed incremental as a source.
However seeding is possible for forward incremental backup chains only.
Could you explain your use case? Have you considered using Forever Forward Incremental Backup method?
Thanks!
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 14
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: May 14, 2013 11:28 am
- Full Name: Eddy Mandemaker
- Contact:
Re: COPY Backup - Source job importance?
Hello,
Probably I misunderstood the manual Seeding procedure.
My original backup is reverse incremental, and used a copy backup (local) to seed a WAN repository manually (via USB disk)
The problem is the first run copy job takes very long time when using the remote repository (whichj i seeded via USB disk) and mostly does not complete in 24 hours..
So? Can i change the backup job to Incremental and will the copy backup work after this ? or do I need to redo the seed?
Regards
Probably I misunderstood the manual Seeding procedure.
My original backup is reverse incremental, and used a copy backup (local) to seed a WAN repository manually (via USB disk)
The problem is the first run copy job takes very long time when using the remote repository (whichj i seeded via USB disk) and mostly does not complete in 24 hours..
So? Can i change the backup job to Incremental and will the copy backup work after this ? or do I need to redo the seed?
Regards
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 14
- Liked: 2 times
- Joined: May 14, 2013 11:28 am
- Full Name: Eddy Mandemaker
- Contact:
Re: COPY Backup - Source job importance?
Hello,
I have a FULL COPY backup at the remote site!
Regards
I have a FULL COPY backup at the remote site!
Regards
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: COPY Backup - Source job importance?
Eddy,
Did you do all steps just like it described in the provided KB?
I`m just trying to figure out if the seeding actually worked well. Do you use WAN Acceleration for your backup copy jobs?
Note that if you use our WAN Acceleration it will have to sync a disk catalog from the source Wan Accelerator to the target Wan Accelerator. You will notice that the job will run longer on its first Sync. Direct mode, does not experience this delay.
Thanks.
Did you do all steps just like it described in the provided KB?
I`m just trying to figure out if the seeding actually worked well. Do you use WAN Acceleration for your backup copy jobs?
Note that if you use our WAN Acceleration it will have to sync a disk catalog from the source Wan Accelerator to the target Wan Accelerator. You will notice that the job will run longer on its first Sync. Direct mode, does not experience this delay.
Yes, it will work. Backup copy job itself is always forward incremental.EddyMandemaker wrote:Can i change the backup job to Incremental and will the copy backup work after this ?
Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 43 guests