Discussions specific to the VMware vSphere hypervisor
Post Reply
egroeg
Enthusiast
Posts: 55
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 23, 2010 2:36 pm
Full Name: George Kenny
Contact:

Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by egroeg » Aug 12, 2015 11:23 am

Hi form.

Is anyone able to provide a quick answer to what the imapact is of running VM with thin disks versus thick when running Veeam to back them up?

I've read this doc which suggests it should make a difference, but have also read varying other material.

I'm running Veeam v8, with vSphere 5.5 + VM version level 8.

http://www.veeam.com/files/whitepapers/ ... covery.pdf

Thanks

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5264
Liked: 459 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by P.Tide » Aug 12, 2015 11:38 am

Hi,

With thin provision there is no extra time expenditures for zero-blocks search, as there are none in a thin disk. With thick provisioning extra time spent for search-and-exclude empty spaces from a backup file. Also, if you use lazy zero thick, there is a chance that some old data will be backed up as well during initial full backup because it has not been zeroed out while allocating .vmdk.

Thank you.

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5264
Liked: 459 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by P.Tide » Aug 12, 2015 2:43 pm

UPDATE:

That applies to newly created disks only. Thin disks are not reduced when data is being deleted from guest OS thus some "unused" space still might be scanned. Also please see this post and this thread

Thank you.

peeky1323
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 12 times
Joined: May 30, 2012 11:58 am
Full Name: Matt Peek
Contact:

[MERGED] Cloud Repository on VM

Post by peeky1323 » Oct 20, 2015 8:41 am

Hi,

We host some Veeam Cloud Backups for a few customers. The repository is on a Hyper-V VM. I was wondering if anyone knows what the performance gain was for having the repository VM disk Fixed instead of Dynamic if any. Given that the bottleneck is the WAN connection, is there a noticeable gain for using Fixed over Dynamic?

Kind regards,

Matt
Matt Peek
VMCE V9

P.Tide
Product Manager
Posts: 5264
Liked: 459 times
Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by P.Tide » Oct 20, 2015 9:37 am

Hi,

Fixed vs Dynamic disk in a Hyper-V is basically the same as Thick vs Thin in a vSphere. Please see the thread for details.

Thank you.

peeky1323
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 12 times
Joined: May 30, 2012 11:58 am
Full Name: Matt Peek
Contact:

Re: Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by peeky1323 » Oct 20, 2015 10:17 am

Hi,

I understand that, and I understand performance in a production environment where the disks are hosting services, files etc. But as this is a Cloud repository, I was wondering if the Bottleneck of the WAN would outweigh any performance increase. I could not find any information on that.

Thanks,

Matt
Matt Peek
VMCE V9

veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 16901
Liked: 1439 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Impact of Thin Provision disks - speed / performance

Post by veremin » Oct 20, 2015 10:34 am

Just ask your tenants regarding the major bottleneck they see in job statistics. Most likely, it's connectivity between their site and yours (WAN). So, modification of target repository wouldn't result in noticeable performance increase. Thanks.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 30 guests